Ward v. Thomas,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Brown |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 1147 |
| Docket Number | M185440 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 07 July 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Carriere de Davide v Westland Insurance Group Ltd
...accepted that the cap is now over $400,000: Alvarado v. KCP Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., 2022 1621 at para. 14; and Ward v. Thomas, 2022 BCSC 1147 at para. 40. That said, upper limit awards are only awarded in cases involving extremely severe injury and where maximum solace must be recognized......
-
Sidhu v Hiebert
...for lost years was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 80: at paras. 517–518; and • Ward v. Thomas, 2022 BCSC 1147, in which no deduction was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 72, being beyond her expected age of retirement, and ......
2 cases
-
Carriere de Davide v Westland Insurance Group Ltd
...accepted that the cap is now over $400,000: Alvarado v. KCP Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., 2022 1621 at para. 14; and Ward v. Thomas, 2022 BCSC 1147 at para. 40. That said, upper limit awards are only awarded in cases involving extremely severe injury and where maximum solace must be recognized......
-
Sidhu v Hiebert
...for lost years was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 80: at paras. 517–518; and • Ward v. Thomas, 2022 BCSC 1147, in which no deduction was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 72, being beyond her expected age of retirement, and ......