Ward v. Thomas,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeBrown
Citation2022 BCSC 1147
Docket NumberM185440
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date07 July 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • 2023 BCSC 813,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...for lost years was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 80: at paras. 517–518; and • Ward v. Thomas, 2022 BCSC 1147, in which no deduction was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 72, being beyond her expected age of retirement, and ......
  • Sidhu v Hiebert,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 12, 2023
    ...for lost years was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 80: at paras. 517–518; and • Ward v. Thomas, 2022 BCSC 1147, in which no deduction was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 72, being beyond her expected age of retirement, and ......
2 cases
  • 2023 BCSC 813,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...for lost years was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 80: at paras. 517–518; and • Ward v. Thomas, 2022 BCSC 1147, in which no deduction was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 72, being beyond her expected age of retirement, and ......
  • Sidhu v Hiebert,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 12, 2023
    ...for lost years was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 80: at paras. 517–518; and • Ward v. Thomas, 2022 BCSC 1147, in which no deduction was made since the plaintiff's life expectancy was to age 72, being beyond her expected age of retirement, and ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT