Watkins v. Sosnowski, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3836
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Perell, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3836,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3836 (SC),2012 ONSC 3836,11-CV-418307 |
| Date | 28 June 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 practice notes
-
B2B Trust v. Pearce et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2305
...She does not need to prove her defence. It is enough if the defence has an air of reality and requires a trial: Watkins v. Sosnowski , 2012 ONSC 3836, per Perell J. at ¶24. This requirement is not meant to be enforced rigidly. I have to take into account the interests of justice as a w......
-
Raso v. Colacci, [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1101 (SC)
...to the above-noted relief sought, the test to set aside a default judgment was aptly set out by Perell J. in Watkins v. Sosnowski , 2012 ONSC 3836 (CanLii), where he stated: [19] On a motion to set aside a default judgment, the court will consider: (a) whether the motion to set aside the ju......
-
Jane Doe 464533 v. N.D., 2017 ONSC 127
...times by this court. The following draws heavily on the summary of the principles in those cases by Perell J. in Watkins v. Sosnowski, 2012 ONSC 3836, at paras. 19-20 and 23-24. . . 50. These factors are not to be treated as rigid rules; the court must consider the particular circumstances ......
-
The Toronto Dominion Bank v. Picard, 2020 ONSC 1289
...times by this court. The following draws heavily on the summary of the principles in those cases by Perell J. in Watkins v. Sosnowski, 2012 ONSC 3836, at paras. 19-20 and 23-24. The court must consider the following three factors: (a) whether the motion was brought promptly after the defend......
Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
-
B2B Trust v. Pearce et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2305
...She does not need to prove her defence. It is enough if the defence has an air of reality and requires a trial: Watkins v. Sosnowski , 2012 ONSC 3836, per Perell J. at ¶24. This requirement is not meant to be enforced rigidly. I have to take into account the interests of justice as a w......
-
Jane Doe 464533 v. N.D., 2017 ONSC 127
...times by this court. The following draws heavily on the summary of the principles in those cases by Perell J. in Watkins v. Sosnowski, 2012 ONSC 3836, at paras. 19-20 and 23-24. . . 50. These factors are not to be treated as rigid rules; the court must consider the particular circumstances ......
-
Raso v. Colacci, [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1101 (SC)
...to the above-noted relief sought, the test to set aside a default judgment was aptly set out by Perell J. in Watkins v. Sosnowski , 2012 ONSC 3836 (CanLii), where he stated: [19] On a motion to set aside a default judgment, the court will consider: (a) whether the motion to set aside the ju......
-
The Toronto Dominion Bank v. Picard, 2020 ONSC 1289
...times by this court. The following draws heavily on the summary of the principles in those cases by Perell J. in Watkins v. Sosnowski, 2012 ONSC 3836, at paras. 19-20 and 23-24. The court must consider the following three factors: (a) whether the motion was brought promptly after the defend......
Request a trial to view additional results