Watt v. Health Sciences Association of British Columbia,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Punnett
Citation2018 BCSC 512
Docket NumberS-134066
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date29 March 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • 2024 BCSC 901,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...for trial at the same time, I have considered that issue. The test is set out in Watt v. Health Sciences Association of British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 512, at para. 30: [30] In Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1628, Satanove J. stated: [2] The parties agree that my decision is a dis......
  • Hallat v Couturier,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 17, 2024
    ...for trial at the same time, I have considered that issue. The test is set out in Watt v. Health Sciences Association of British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 512, at para. 30: [30] In Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1628, Satanove J. stated: [2] The parties agree that my decision is a dis......
  • Workman Optometry Professional Corporation et al. v. Certas Home and Auto Insurance Company et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 28, 2022
    ...A similar result occurred in the British Columbia Supreme Court case of Watt v. Health Sciences Association of British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 512, at para. 49, where the Court refused to consolidate an individual action with a class action and found that “the weight of authority is agai......
3 cases
  • 2024 BCSC 901,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...for trial at the same time, I have considered that issue. The test is set out in Watt v. Health Sciences Association of British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 512, at para. 30: [30] In Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1628, Satanove J. stated: [2] The parties agree that my decision is a dis......
  • Hallat v Couturier,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 17, 2024
    ...for trial at the same time, I have considered that issue. The test is set out in Watt v. Health Sciences Association of British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 512, at para. 30: [30] In Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1628, Satanove J. stated: [2] The parties agree that my decision is a dis......
  • Workman Optometry Professional Corporation et al. v. Certas Home and Auto Insurance Company et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 28, 2022
    ...A similar result occurred in the British Columbia Supreme Court case of Watt v. Health Sciences Association of British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 512, at para. 49, where the Court refused to consolidate an individual action with a class action and found that “the weight of authority is agai......