WEISBECK v. CITY OF REGINA
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Judge | KALMAKOFF J. |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 60 |
| Date | 21 February 2018 |
| Docket Number | QBG 312 of 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Gullett v. Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Vinesh Pillay and Abraham Philip Meyer
...first be given to whether this is an appropriate circumstance in which to proceed pursuant to Rule 7-1. [22] In Weisbeck v Regina (City), 2018 SKQB 60, 18 CPC (8th) 376 [Weisbeck], this Court identified the requirements of Rule 7-1, commencing at para. 10 Rule 7-1 requires a two-step proces......
-
GRAN v. NAKONECHNY
...In Weisbeck v Regina (City), 2018 SKQB 60, 18 CPC (8th) 376 [Weisbeck], this Court identified the requirements of Rule 7‑1, commencing at [10]     Rule 7‑1 requires a two‑step process. First, one or more of the parties must apply for an ord......
-
STEVECO CONSTRUCTION LTD. v. SASKATCHEWAN POWER CORPORATION
...In Weisbeck v Regina (City), 2018 SKQB 60, 18 CPC (8th) 376, the two‑step application process under Rule 7-1 was collapsed into a single hearing. At para. 12, the court [12] . . . the two steps can be combined into one in appropriate cases, for instance where the first step is readil......
-
STACEY v. LUKENCHUK
...There is authority that indicates the two steps can be combined into one hearing in an appropriate case (see Weisbeck v Regina (City), 2018 SKQB 60 [Weisbeck]). In this case both the plaintiff and the defendant petition the Court to deal with the two steps contemplated under Rule 7-1 in one......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity v. Government of Saskatchewan
...being varied on appeal. [126] The methodology behind the application of this provision was described in Weisbeck v Regina (City), 2018 SKQB 60 at paras 9-13, 18 CPC (8th) ANALYSIS Applications under Rule 7-1: Is this an appropriate case to determine an issue before the trial? [9] Rule 7-1 p......
-
Korvemaker v. Whitley
...2008 SKQB 426 at paras 11-21; Penzie v Pfeifer, 2011 SKQB 1 at para 34; Harding v Skopyk, 2014 SKQB 104 at paras 24-25; Re Weisbeck, 2018 SKQB 60 at para 47; Bearboy v Hardy, 2021 SKQB 118 at paras 11-14 [Bearboy]; Howarth v Leer, 2023 SKKB 109 at para 41 [Howarth]; and Johnson v Witchekan,......
-
Standing Buffalo Dakota First Nation v. Maurice Law Barristers and Solicitors (Ron S. Maurice Professional Corporation)
...following the appointment of the Stage Two Judge, so that the second step in the process outlined in Weisbeck v Regina (City), 2018 SKQB 60, 18 CPC (8th) 376, may be completed before the said Judge who will decide whether any limitations or other terms will circumscribe the Local Registrar ......
-
Gullett v. Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Vinesh Pillay and Abraham Philip Meyer
...first be given to whether this is an appropriate circumstance in which to proceed pursuant to Rule 7-1. [22] In Weisbeck v Regina (City), 2018 SKQB 60, 18 CPC (8th) 376 [Weisbeck], this Court identified the requirements of Rule 7-1, commencing at para. 10 Rule 7-1 requires a two-step proces......
Get Started for Free