Westpoint Capital Corporation v Solomon Spruce Ridge Inc, 2017 ABQB 497

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Robert A. Graesser
Date09 August 2017
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number1503 04033
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Bruno v Samson Cree Nation, 2020 ABQB 504
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 31, 2020
    ...factors under Rule 9.13 – see also Behm v Hansen, 2019 ABQB 813 at para 20; Westpoint Capital Corporation v Solomon Spruce Ridge Inc, 2017 ABQB 497 at para 59 (avoidance of the possible risk of incomplete argument and analysis, or oversight or potential error, avoiding a costly appeal); MAK......
  • WHG Investments Ltd v Unterschultz,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 3, 2020
    ...were made. B. Application of Rule 9.13 [4] I take Graesser J’s decision in Westpoint Capital Corporation v Solomon Spruce Ridge Inc, 2017 ABQB 497 to mean that the Court should correct itself where it makes a blatant error of law and avoid forcing the parties to unnecessary appeal. That mak......
2 cases
  • Bruno v Samson Cree Nation, 2020 ABQB 504
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 31, 2020
    ...factors under Rule 9.13 – see also Behm v Hansen, 2019 ABQB 813 at para 20; Westpoint Capital Corporation v Solomon Spruce Ridge Inc, 2017 ABQB 497 at para 59 (avoidance of the possible risk of incomplete argument and analysis, or oversight or potential error, avoiding a costly appeal); MAK......
  • WHG Investments Ltd v Unterschultz,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 3, 2020
    ...were made. B. Application of Rule 9.13 [4] I take Graesser J’s decision in Westpoint Capital Corporation v Solomon Spruce Ridge Inc, 2017 ABQB 497 to mean that the Court should correct itself where it makes a blatant error of law and avoid forcing the parties to unnecessary appeal. That mak......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT