Whiteman v. Iamkhong et al., [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 542
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Laskin, Pardu and D. Brown, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Subject Matter | LIMITATION OF ACTIONS,PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 542,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 542 (CA),2015 ONCA 564 |
| Date | 29 July 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Caruso v. DH Professional Corporation,
...“best foot forward”. Whiteman v. Iamkhong et al., 2013 ONSC 2175, at paras. 29-31 (“Whiteman”), aff’d 2015 ONCA 564. Position of [34] Caruso argues that his amended claim, taken ......
-
Royal Crown Academic School Inc. v. Wu, 2017 ONSC 7295
...and put their “best foot forward”: see Whiteman v. Iamkhong et al., 2013 ONSC 2175 at paras. 29-31, aff’d 2015 ONCA 564. Issues [15] The defendants bring this motion for summary judgment on the basis that the Email......
-
Ontario: A Look At 2015 In Limitations Law
...judgment motion may be, a limitations argument is doomed if raised for the first time in the Court of Appeal. In Whiteman v. Iamkhong, 2015 ONCA 564, (one of the few notable Court of Appeal limitations decisions this year), the plaintiff appealed from the summary dismissal of his action as ......
-
Manangan v. Shanmungam,
...and put their “best foot forward”: Whiteman v. Iamkhong et al., 2013 ONSC 2175, at paras. 29-31, aff’d 2015 ONCA 564. Analysis and conclusions Plaintiff’s motion for payment of Sale Proceeds: [20] &......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Caruso v. DH Professional Corporation,
...“best foot forward”. Whiteman v. Iamkhong et al., 2013 ONSC 2175, at paras. 29-31 (“Whiteman”), aff’d 2015 ONCA 564. Position of [34] Caruso argues that his amended claim, taken ......
-
Royal Crown Academic School Inc. v. Wu, 2017 ONSC 7295
...and put their “best foot forward”: see Whiteman v. Iamkhong et al., 2013 ONSC 2175 at paras. 29-31, aff’d 2015 ONCA 564. Issues [15] The defendants bring this motion for summary judgment on the basis that the Email......
-
Manangan v. Shanmungam,
...and put their “best foot forward”: Whiteman v. Iamkhong et al., 2013 ONSC 2175, at paras. 29-31, aff’d 2015 ONCA 564. Analysis and conclusions Plaintiff’s motion for payment of Sale Proceeds: [20] &......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario: A Look At 2015 In Limitations Law
...judgment motion may be, a limitations argument is doomed if raised for the first time in the Court of Appeal. In Whiteman v. Iamkhong, 2015 ONCA 564, (one of the few notable Court of Appeal limitations decisions this year), the plaintiff appealed from the summary dismissal of his action as ......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 27-31, 2015)
...name to read the summary) Keywords: Damages, Implied Warranty, Agriculture, Diseases Animals, Sale of Goods Act Whiteman v. Iamkhong, 2015 ONCA 564 (click on the case name to read the Keywords: New Issues on Appeal, Summary Judgment, Sponsorship Undertaking, Permanent Resident status, HIV s......