Whiteside v. Govindasamy
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Justice Lorne Sossin |
| Date | 05 February 2021 |
| Docket Number | FS-18-000576 |
| Citation | 2021 ONSC 789 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Want v. Gauthier
...The parties’ payment of the mortgage and tax payments was in the form of rent.  As stated in Whiteside v. Govindasamy 2021 ONSC 789, “absent a financial contribution to the initial purchase of the property and a gratuitous transfer, a resulting trust cannot exist”.......
-
Leyen v Leyen
...and to follow court orders. 69 The applicant relies on the decision of Sossin J. (as he then was) in Whiteside v. Govindasamy, 2021 ONSC 789. In that decision, Sossin J. was asked to draw negative inferences due to the respondent's lack of disclosure. In that case, Sossin J. said at para. 5......
2 cases
-
Want v. Gauthier
...The parties’ payment of the mortgage and tax payments was in the form of rent. As stated in Whiteside v. Govindasamy 2021 ONSC 789, “absent a financial contribution to the initial purchase of the property and a gratuitous transfer, a resulting trust cannot exist”.......
-
Leyen v Leyen
...and to follow court orders. 69 The applicant relies on the decision of Sossin J. (as he then was) in Whiteside v. Govindasamy, 2021 ONSC 789. In that decision, Sossin J. was asked to draw negative inferences due to the respondent's lack of disclosure. In that case, Sossin J. said at para. 5......