Williams v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 100

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 100
Date30 January 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Li v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1461
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 25 Octubre 2022
    ...between this Court’s Stay Order and the issue to be decided in this Application (Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 100 at para 41). Thus, the finding of irreparable harm cannot serve as the sole basis for granting of this Application. [31] After all, there were......
  • Abdel Kadder v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 FC 914
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 13 Septiembre 2018
    ...giving the impression counsel is testifying via proxy, which is improper practice: Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 100 at para 56. [31]  Although Ms. Dhamasiri’s two affidavits attach some non-controversial documents, they also include information that g......
  • Yuan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 755
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 18 Julio 2018
    ...from the Applicant’s counsel, giving the impression counsel is testifying via proxy which is improper practice (Williams v Canada (MCI), 2018 FC 100 at paragraph 56). Accordingly, that paragraphs 15-17, 22-24, 26, 27, and 31 should be struck or given no weight. This issue was not addressed ......
3 cases
  • Li v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1461
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 25 Octubre 2022
    ...between this Court’s Stay Order and the issue to be decided in this Application (Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 100 at para 41). Thus, the finding of irreparable harm cannot serve as the sole basis for granting of this Application. [31] After all, there were......
  • Abdel Kadder v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 FC 914
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 13 Septiembre 2018
    ...giving the impression counsel is testifying via proxy, which is improper practice: Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 100 at para 56. [31]  Although Ms. Dhamasiri’s two affidavits attach some non-controversial documents, they also include information that g......
  • Yuan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 755
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 18 Julio 2018
    ...from the Applicant’s counsel, giving the impression counsel is testifying via proxy which is improper practice (Williams v Canada (MCI), 2018 FC 100 at paragraph 56). Accordingly, that paragraphs 15-17, 22-24, 26, 27, and 31 should be struck or given no weight. This issue was not addressed ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT