Williams v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 8
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | January 03, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2020 FC 8 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Satkunanathan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 470
...shall be limited to a review of the application for H&C considerations alone (Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 8). [104] This is not a case where any failure on the part of Former Counsel affected the IAD’s determination on the issues upon which the IAD did make ......
-
Shala v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 326
...see Li v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 754 (Elliott J.), at paras 10-11; Williams v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 8 (Norris J.), at paras 52-53, 61 and 67; and Mpoyi v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 251 (Bell J.), at paras 31-33. For......
-
Friesen Letkeman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1396
...a compelling need to remain in or enter Canada is needed for the TRP analysis: Williams v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 8, at paras 64-66. [41] In this case, I note that the Officer did not address whether the submissions in support of the H&C application are......
-
Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 376
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FCA 189 at para 18 [Kisana]; Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 8 at para 20). The Court shall bear in mind the deference that is owed to decisions made under section 25(1) of Act (Kanthasamy at para 64). [47] As......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
Satkunanathan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 470
...shall be limited to a review of the application for H&C considerations alone (Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 8). [104] This is not a case where any failure on the part of Former Counsel affected the IAD’s determination on the issues upon which the IAD did make ......
-
Shala v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 326
...see Li v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 754 (Elliott J.), at paras 10-11; Williams v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 8 (Norris J.), at paras 52-53, 61 and 67; and Mpoyi v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 251 (Bell J.), at paras 31-33. For......
-
Friesen Letkeman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1396
...a compelling need to remain in or enter Canada is needed for the TRP analysis: Williams v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 8, at paras 64-66. [41] In this case, I note that the Officer did not address whether the submissions in support of the H&C application are......
-
Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 376
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FCA 189 at para 18 [Kisana]; Williams v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 8 at para 20). The Court shall bear in mind the deference that is owed to decisions made under section 25(1) of Act (Kanthasamy at para 64). [47] As......
Request a trial to view additional results