Williams v. Loverock, 2013 BCSC 153

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeGoepel, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterDAMAGES,DAMAGE AWARDS
Citation2013 BCSC 153,[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 153,[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 153 (SC)
Date01 February 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Thorne v. Lind, 2013 BCSC 862
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 d4 Maio d4 2013
    ...1737 ($50,000 non-pecuniary damages); ∙ Wepryk v. Juraschka , 2012 BCSC 974 ($50,000 non-pecuniary damages); and ∙ Williams v. Loverock , 2013 BCSC 153 ($50,000 non-pecuniary damages). [280] Of course, no two cases are alike. [281] In this case, the plaintiff not only suffered serious pain ......
  • Wattar v. Lu et al., 2013 BCSC 603
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 d3 Abril d3 2013
    ...those that were before the court in Edmondson v. Payer , 2011 BCSC 118, Rezeai v. Piedade , 2012 BCSC 1782 and Williams v. Loverock , 2013 BCSC 153. The impact of the physical injuries was aggravated in this case by the severe emotional reaction that hampered the plaintiff at a crucial stag......
2 cases
  • Thorne v. Lind, 2013 BCSC 862
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 d4 Maio d4 2013
    ...1737 ($50,000 non-pecuniary damages); ∙ Wepryk v. Juraschka , 2012 BCSC 974 ($50,000 non-pecuniary damages); and ∙ Williams v. Loverock , 2013 BCSC 153 ($50,000 non-pecuniary damages). [280] Of course, no two cases are alike. [281] In this case, the plaintiff not only suffered serious pain ......
  • Wattar v. Lu et al., 2013 BCSC 603
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 d3 Abril d3 2013
    ...those that were before the court in Edmondson v. Payer , 2011 BCSC 118, Rezeai v. Piedade , 2012 BCSC 1782 and Williams v. Loverock , 2013 BCSC 153. The impact of the physical injuries was aggravated in this case by the severe emotional reaction that hampered the plaintiff at a crucial stag......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT