Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Marzari |
| Citation | 2018 BCSC 711 |
| Date | 02 May 2018 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S140719 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Bostrom v. Bigford, 2019 BCSC 79
...no gift where the transfer was under undue influence: Brown v. Manuch Estate, 2015 BCSC 1966 at para. 152; Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711 at paras. 166-170. A presumption of undue influence arises where the relationship between the parties gives rise to the potential of dominati......
-
Chung v. Chung, 2022 BCSC 1396
...to which a specific beneficiary has been designated such as RRSPs, RRIFs, and insurance policies.” In Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711, Justice Marzari applied the presumption of a resulting trust to an RRIF, RIF, and TFSA for which the deceased’s son was listed as t......
-
Does The "Presumption Of Resulting Trust" Apply To Beneficiary Designations?
...the estate. Such an approach has been consistently followed by the Court: Re Stade Estate, 2017 BCSC 2354; Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711. In the recent case of Simard v. Simard Estate, 2021 BCSC 1836, the Pecore analysis was again applied to RRIFs and a TFSA with designated ben......
-
Campbell Estate (Re), 2022 BCSC 2184
...death. [Emphasis added.] [204] At para. 85 of Kolic, Punnet J. referred to Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711 [Williams], where Justice Marzari summarized several possible [87] With respect to joint accounts, Pecore (s......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Bostrom v. Bigford, 2019 BCSC 79
...no gift where the transfer was under undue influence: Brown v. Manuch Estate, 2015 BCSC 1966 at para. 152; Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711 at paras. 166-170. A presumption of undue influence arises where the relationship between the parties gives rise to the potential of dominati......
-
Chung v. Chung,
...to which a specific beneficiary has been designated such as RRSPs, RRIFs, and insurance policies.” In Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711, Justice Marzari applied the presumption of a resulting trust to an RRIF, RIF, and TFSA for which the deceased’s son was listed as t......
-
Campbell Estate (Re),
...death. [Emphasis added.] [204] At para. 85 of Kolic, Punnet J. referred to Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711 [Williams], where Justice Marzari summarized several possible [87] With respect to joint accounts, Pecore (s......
-
Young v. Veselic,
...joint account, to the extent that such evidence helps in determining the original intention of the donor: Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711, para. 90. [13] There was much evidence as to the Testatrix’s complaints about th......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Does The "Presumption Of Resulting Trust" Apply To Beneficiary Designations?
...the estate. Such an approach has been consistently followed by the Court: Re Stade Estate, 2017 BCSC 2354; Williams v. Williams Estate, 2018 BCSC 711. In the recent case of Simard v. Simard Estate, 2021 BCSC 1836, the Pecore analysis was again applied to RRIFs and a TFSA with designated ben......