Wilson v. Fatahi-Ghandehari

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeLauwers, Miller and Nordheimer JJ.A.
Citation2018 ONCA 728
Date04 September 2018
Docket NumberM49391 (C64926)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 30, 2023 ' February 3, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 9, 2023
    ...Process, Rules of Civil Procedure, rr. 2.1, 2.1.01(1), 2.1.01(3), 59.06(2), Bell v. Fishka, 2022 ONCA 683 , Wilson v. Fatahi-Ghandehari, 2018 ONCA 728,Fatahi-Ghandehari v. Wilson, 2017 ONSC 6034 , Fatahi-Ghandehari v. Wilson, 2018 ONSC 5579 , Fatahi-Ghandehari v. Wilson, 2021 ONSC 3547 ......
  • Fatahi-Ghandehari v Wilson
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 15, 2024
    ...is the Respondent's conduct over the course of the entire litigation. Back in 2018, the Court of Appeal criticized him, stating ( 2018 ONCA 728 at para. 10): [10] The record amply shows that the appellant has made a procedural morass of this case. The record of non-compliance with customary......
  • Wilson v Fatahi-Ghandehari
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 2, 2023
    ...been found on more than one occasion to have been responsible for the wasteful litigation that has occurred. In a prior appeal decision, 2018 ONCA 728, this court found that “the record amply shows that the appellant [Mr. Wilson] has made a procedural morass of this case”. In ......
  • Fatahi-Ghandehari v Wilson
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 19, 2022
    ...strengthened by the overall approach to this litigation that Mr. Wilson has adopted.  More than four years ago, the Court of Appeal (2018 ONCA 728) stated that “the record amply shows that the appellant [Mr. Wilson] has made a procedural morass of this case.”  Mr. Wi......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • Fatahi-Ghandehari v Wilson
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 19, 2022
    ...is strengthened by the overall approach to this litigation that Mr. Wilson has adopted. More than four years ago, the Court of Appeal (2018 ONCA 728) stated that “the record amply shows that the appellant [Mr. Wilson] has made a procedural morass of this case.” Mr. Wilson has continued to b......
  • Fatahi-Ghandehari v. Wilson
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 31, 2024
    ...and otherwise comply with Court directions. The Respondent appealed this decision. [31] The appeal was quashed by the Court of Appeal (2018 ONCA 728) and, in its reasons, the Court of Appeal observed that the Respondent “has made a procedural morass out of this case. The record of non-compl......
  • Wilson v. Fatahi-Ghandehari
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • February 2, 2023
    ...been found on more than one occasion to have been responsible for the wasteful litigation that has occurred. In a prior appeal decision, 2018 ONCA 728, this court found that “the record amply shows that the appellant [Mr. Wilson] has made a procedural morass of this case”. In the trial deci......
  • Fatahi-Ghandehari v. Wilson
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 26, 2021
    ...parties, but to the preservation order granted in the Family Law action. Since this case has become, to quote the Court of Appeal (2018 ONCA 728), a “procedural morass”, it is important to litigate it in an orderly [56] Third, this case has consumed considerable court resources. I am concer......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 30, 2023 ' February 3, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 9, 2023
    ...Process, Rules of Civil Procedure, rr. 2.1, 2.1.01(1), 2.1.01(3), 59.06(2), Bell v. Fishka, 2022 ONCA 683 , Wilson v. Fatahi-Ghandehari, 2018 ONCA 728,Fatahi-Ghandehari v. Wilson, 2017 ONSC 6034 , Fatahi-Ghandehari v. Wilson, 2018 ONSC 5579 , Fatahi-Ghandehari v. Wilson, 2021 ONSC 3547 ......