Winship v. Stantec Consulting Ltd. et al.

JudgeGoss, J.
Date23 August 2016
Citation2016 ABQB 468
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd v GO Community Centre
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 13, 2019
    ...Stantec. This was a case in which expert evidence was not necessary to attribute responsibility: see Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468, Goss J at paras [379] The reasons why what was installed did not function as required were beside the point, given the actual performance of ......
  • Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc. (IMV Projects Inc.), 2018 ABCA 305
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 21, 2018
    ...is involved: see Tran at para 21; Cunningham v Wiltzen, 2017 ABCA 185 at para 41, [2017] 11 WWR 22. In Winship v Stantec Consulting, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 125, 62 CLR (4th) 200, also a case involving a claim against an engineering firm based on breach of contract, negligence and negligent m......
  • Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc. (IMV Projects Inc.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 21, 2018
    ...is involved: see Tran at para 21; Cunningham v Wiltzen, 2017 ABCA 185 at para 41, [2017] 11 WWR 22. In Winship v Stantec Consulting, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 125, 62 CLR (4th) 200, also a case involving a claim against an engineering firm based on breach of contract, negligence and negligent m......
  • Bruen v University of Calgary
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 11, 2018
    ...reasonable inferences from it. The legal test articulated in Capital Estate was recently utilized in Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 6, 62 CLR (4th) 200. Position of the PartiesThe University’s position[7] The University of Calgary submits that the Statement of Claim......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd v GO Community Centre
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 13, 2019
    ...Stantec. This was a case in which expert evidence was not necessary to attribute responsibility: see Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468, Goss J at paras [379] The reasons why what was installed did not function as required were beside the point, given the actual performance of ......
  • Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc. (IMV Projects Inc.), 2018 ABCA 305
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 21, 2018
    ...is involved: see Tran at para 21; Cunningham v Wiltzen, 2017 ABCA 185 at para 41, [2017] 11 WWR 22. In Winship v Stantec Consulting, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 125, 62 CLR (4th) 200, also a case involving a claim against an engineering firm based on breach of contract, negligence and negligent m......
  • Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc. (IMV Projects Inc.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 21, 2018
    ...is involved: see Tran at para 21; Cunningham v Wiltzen, 2017 ABCA 185 at para 41, [2017] 11 WWR 22. In Winship v Stantec Consulting, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 125, 62 CLR (4th) 200, also a case involving a claim against an engineering firm based on breach of contract, negligence and negligent m......
  • Bruen v University of Calgary
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 11, 2018
    ...reasonable inferences from it. The legal test articulated in Capital Estate was recently utilized in Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 6, 62 CLR (4th) 200. Position of the PartiesThe University’s position[7] The University of Calgary submits that the Statement of Claim......
  • Get Started for Free