Winship v. Stantec Consulting Ltd. et al., 2016 ABQB 468
Judge | Goss, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Subject Matter | CONTRACTS,TORTS,EVIDENCE,PROFESSIONAL OCCUPATIONS,FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION |
Citation | 2016 ABQB 468 |
Date | 23 August 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd v GO Community Centre, 2019 ABQB 706
...Stantec. This was a case in which expert evidence was not necessary to attribute responsibility: see Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468, Goss J at paras [379] The reasons why what was installed did not function as required were beside the point, given the actual performance of ......
-
Bruen v University of Calgary, 2018 ABQB 26
...reasonable inferences from it. The legal test articulated in Capital Estate was recently utilized in Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 6, 62 CLR (4th) 200. Position of the PartiesThe University’s position[7] The University of Calgary submits that the Statement of Claim......
-
2024 ABCJ 87,
...Defendant's breach caused the Plaintiff to sustain damages; and (4) the damages were not too remote ( Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 119 [ Winship], Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc (IMV Projects Inc), 2017 ABQB 106 at para 115 [ ......
-
Jackson v Michelson,
...Defendant's breach caused the Plaintiff to sustain damages; and (4) the damages were not too remote ( Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 119 [ Winship], Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc (IMV Projects Inc), 2017 ABQB 106 at para 115 [ ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd v GO Community Centre, 2019 ABQB 706
...Stantec. This was a case in which expert evidence was not necessary to attribute responsibility: see Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468, Goss J at paras [379] The reasons why what was installed did not function as required were beside the point, given the actual performance of ......
-
Bruen v University of Calgary, 2018 ABQB 26
...reasonable inferences from it. The legal test articulated in Capital Estate was recently utilized in Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 6, 62 CLR (4th) 200. Position of the PartiesThe University’s position[7] The University of Calgary submits that the Statement of Claim......
-
2024 ABCJ 87,
...Defendant's breach caused the Plaintiff to sustain damages; and (4) the damages were not too remote ( Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 119 [ Winship], Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc (IMV Projects Inc), 2017 ABQB 106 at para 115 [ ......
-
Jackson v Michelson,
...Defendant's breach caused the Plaintiff to sustain damages; and (4) the damages were not too remote ( Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 119 [ Winship], Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc (IMV Projects Inc), 2017 ABQB 106 at para 115 [ ......
Request a trial to view additional results