Winship v. Stantec Consulting Ltd. et al., 2016 ABQB 468

JudgeGoss, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterCONTRACTS,TORTS,EVIDENCE,PROFESSIONAL OCCUPATIONS,FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION
Date23 August 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd v GO Community Centre, 2019 ABQB 706
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 13, 2019
    ...Stantec. This was a case in which expert evidence was not necessary to attribute responsibility: see Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468, Goss J at paras [379] The reasons why what was installed did not function as required were beside the point, given the actual performance of ......
  • Bruen v University of Calgary, 2018 ABQB 26
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 11, 2018
    ...reasonable inferences from it. The legal test articulated in Capital Estate was recently utilized in Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 6, 62 CLR (4th) 200. Position of the PartiesThe University’s position[7] The University of Calgary submits that the Statement of Claim......
  • Moura v ECO Construction Inc, 2018 ABQB 371
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 3, 2018
    ...Defendant’s breach caused the Plaintiff to sustain damages; and (4) the damages were not too remote (Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 119 [Winship], Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc (IMV Projects Inc), 2017 ABQB 106 at para 115 [Can......
  • Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc. (IMV Projects Inc.), 2018 ABCA 305
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 21, 2018
    ...is involved: see Tran at para 21; Cunningham v Wiltzen, 2017 ABCA 185 at para 41, [2017] 11 WWR 22. In Winship v Stantec Consulting, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 125, 62 CLR (4th) 200, also a case involving a claim against an engineering firm based on breach of contract, negligence and negligent m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd v GO Community Centre, 2019 ABQB 706
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 13, 2019
    ...Stantec. This was a case in which expert evidence was not necessary to attribute responsibility: see Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468, Goss J at paras [379] The reasons why what was installed did not function as required were beside the point, given the actual performance of ......
  • Bruen v University of Calgary, 2018 ABQB 26
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 11, 2018
    ...reasonable inferences from it. The legal test articulated in Capital Estate was recently utilized in Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 6, 62 CLR (4th) 200. Position of the PartiesThe University’s position[7] The University of Calgary submits that the Statement of Claim......
  • Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc. (IMV Projects Inc.), 2018 ABCA 305
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 21, 2018
    ...is involved: see Tran at para 21; Cunningham v Wiltzen, 2017 ABCA 185 at para 41, [2017] 11 WWR 22. In Winship v Stantec Consulting, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 125, 62 CLR (4th) 200, also a case involving a claim against an engineering firm based on breach of contract, negligence and negligent m......
  • Moura v ECO Construction Inc, 2018 ABQB 371
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 3, 2018
    ...Defendant’s breach caused the Plaintiff to sustain damages; and (4) the damages were not too remote (Winship v Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2016 ABQB 468 at para 119 [Winship], Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Wood Group Mustang (Canada) Inc (IMV Projects Inc), 2017 ABQB 106 at para 115 [Can......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT