Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585
Judge | Mr. Justice S.N. Mandziuk |
Citation | 2019 ABQB 585 |
Date | 01 August 2019 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Docket Number | 1103 03674 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
1384334 Alberta Ltd v Buster's Pizza Donair & Pasta Enterprises Ltd, 2020 ABQB 369
...quantum meruit. This remedy allows a party to recover the value of services rendered or goods provided: Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585 at paras 93 and 94 [68] Restitutionary quantum meruit is available to compensate a party for the value of work, goods or services rendered wh......
-
Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 968
...to the substantive issues between the parties that were tried before me for approximately 14 days: Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585 [Trial Decision]. [2] In the Trial Decision, I granted the Plaintiff judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $46,490.60. The judgment was ......
-
Kosteckyj v Paramount Resources Ltd,
...1.2 and 3.68 are engaged in determining whether or not to grant an application to amend pleadings. In Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585, Justice Mandziuk said, at para 18, that his decision to “to adjudicate upon all of the parties’ arguments, causes of action and defences, rega......
-
Think Leaving Equipment On Site Extends Your Lien Period? Think Again.
...project extends a lien period was recently considered by the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Woodbridge Homes Inc. v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585. Woodbridge was the contractor/agent with respect to the purchase/construction of several different properties for the defendant, Andrews. Woodbridge......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
1384334 Alberta Ltd v Buster's Pizza Donair & Pasta Enterprises Ltd, 2020 ABQB 369
...quantum meruit. This remedy allows a party to recover the value of services rendered or goods provided: Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585 at paras 93 and 94 [68] Restitutionary quantum meruit is available to compensate a party for the value of work, goods or services rendered wh......
-
Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 968
...to the substantive issues between the parties that were tried before me for approximately 14 days: Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585 [Trial Decision]. [2] In the Trial Decision, I granted the Plaintiff judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $46,490.60. The judgment was ......
-
Kosteckyj v Paramount Resources Ltd,
...1.2 and 3.68 are engaged in determining whether or not to grant an application to amend pleadings. In Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585, Justice Mandziuk said, at para 18, that his decision to “to adjudicate upon all of the parties’ arguments, causes of action and defences, rega......
-
2023 ABCJ 202,
...for a donative intent are: an intention to give, an acceptance and a sufficient act of delivery: see Woodbridge Homes Inc v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585 at para 115. In this case, as already discussed, these parties, over the term of their five-year relationship, provided assistance and benefits ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Think Leaving Equipment On Site Extends Your Lien Period? Think Again.
...project extends a lien period was recently considered by the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Woodbridge Homes Inc. v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585. Woodbridge was the contractor/agent with respect to the purchase/construction of several different properties for the defendant, Andrews. Woodbridge......
-
Think Leaving Equipment On Site Extends Your Lien Period? Think Again
...project extends a lien period was recently considered by the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench in Woodbridge Homes Inc. v Andrews, 2019 ABQB 585. Woodbridge was the contractor/agent with respect to the purchase/construction of several different properties for the defendant, Andrews. Woodbridge......