Woods v. Jackiewicz

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeJuriansz, Pardu and Huscroft JJ.A.
Citation2020 ONCA 458
Date13 July 2020
Docket NumberC66929

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 13 ' 17, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 21, 2020
    ...the husband had accrued during the marriage, citing a lack of jurisdiction. The Court agreed with the trial judge. Woods v. Jackiewicz , 2020 ONCA 458 [Juriansz, Pardu and Huscroft JJ.A.] Counsel: Thomas J. Curry, Mitchell C. Brown, Mark Veneziano, Dena Varah and Robert Trenker, for the app......
  • Metro Ontario Real Estate Ltd. v. Hillmond Investments Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 6, 2024
    ...Ltd., 2019 ABQB 843, at para. 20; Chabot v. Chaube, 2014 BCSC 300, at para. 143. [2] Woods (Litigaton Guardian) v. Jackiewicz, 2020 ONCA 458, at para. 27; Lambert v. Quinn (1994), 110 D.L.R. (4th) 284 (Ont. C.A.), at pp. [3] See rule 31.06(2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Re......
  • Louis Dreyfus Company Canada ULC v. Canadian National Railway Company
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 25, 2025
    ...the Defendant could have called or subpoenaed these individuals should CN have thought it appropriate to do so (Woods v Jackiewicz, 2020 ONCA 458 at para 27 as cited in Sea Tow Services International, Inc v C-Tow Marine Assistance Ltd, 2025 FC 27, and Wiche v Ontario, 2001 CanLII 28413 (ONS......
  • Sandhar v. Sandhar
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 23, 2022
    ...the circumstances, I may – and do – draw an adverse inference from the failure to call such important evidence (see: Woods v. Jackiewicz, 2020 ONCA 458, at para. 27).  I draw adverse inferences against both Sukhbender’s and Karnail’s respective claims that they paid 100% of the Subject......
  • Get Started for Free
4 cases
  • Metro Ontario Real Estate Ltd. v. Hillmond Investments Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    • May 6, 2024
    ...Ltd., 2019 ABQB 843, at para. 20; Chabot v. Chaube, 2014 BCSC 300, at para. 143. [2] Woods (Litigaton Guardian) v. Jackiewicz, 2020 ONCA 458, at para. 27; Lambert v. Quinn (1994), 110 D.L.R. (4th) 284 (Ont. C.A.), at pp. [3] See rule 31.06(2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Re......
  • Louis Dreyfus Company Canada ULC v. Canadian National Railway Company
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 25, 2025
    ...the Defendant could have called or subpoenaed these individuals should CN have thought it appropriate to do so (Woods v Jackiewicz, 2020 ONCA 458 at para 27 as cited in Sea Tow Services International, Inc v C-Tow Marine Assistance Ltd, 2025 FC 27, and Wiche v Ontario, 2001 CanLII 28413 (ONS......
  • Sandhar v. Sandhar
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    • December 23, 2022
    ...the circumstances, I may – and do – draw an adverse inference from the failure to call such important evidence (see: Woods v. Jackiewicz, 2020 ONCA 458, at para. 27).  I draw adverse inferences against both Sukhbender’s and Karnail’s respective claims that they paid 100% of the Subject......
  • Sea Tow Services International, Inc. v. C-Tow Marine Assistance Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 6, 2025
    ...inference should not be drawn if either party could have called the witness if they thought it was important (see Woods v Jackiewicz, 2020 ONCA 458 at para 27). Sea Tow has offered no explanation why it could not have called Mr. Dupré as a [95] In the absence of the adverse inference that S......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 13 ' 17, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 21, 2020
    ...the husband had accrued during the marriage, citing a lack of jurisdiction. The Court agreed with the trial judge. Woods v. Jackiewicz , 2020 ONCA 458 [Juriansz, Pardu and Huscroft JJ.A.] Counsel: Thomas J. Curry, Mitchell C. Brown, Mark Veneziano, Dena Varah and Robert Trenker, for the app......