Workplace Discrimination against Sexual Minorities: Subtle and not‐so‐subtle

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1438
Published date01 June 2017
AuthorEric D. Wesselmann,Eros R. DeSouza,Dan Ispas
Date01 June 2017
Workplace Discrimination against Sexual
Minorities: Subtle and not-so-subtle
Eros R. DeSouza
Illinois State University
Eric D. Wesselmann*
Illinois State University
Dan Ispas
Illinois State University
Abstract
Sexual minorities (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
individuals; LGBT) experience workplace discrimination
that leads to decreased physical and emotional well-being,
and negative job outcomes. LGBT individuals may also ex-
perience microaggressions and ostracism in the workplace.
Microaggressions are brief and subtle slights or insults that
can be either conscious or unconscious, which have nega-
tive consequences similar to direct old-fashionedforms
of discrimination. Ostracism, being ignored and excluded,
has similar negative outcomes. Microaggressions and
ostracism are often ambiguous and diff‌icult to substantiate
legally, whereas other forms of discrimination can be
observed directly. We review the literature on
microaggressions and ostracism, which have recently been
investigated with LGBT populations, suggesting future re-
search directions. We suggest practices for encouraging an
organizational climate of acceptance. Copyright © 2017
ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: microaggressions, ostracism, exclusion, LGBT,
workplace discrimination
Résumé
Dans les lieux de travail, les minorités sexuelles (les
lesbiennes, les gays, les bisexuels et les transsexuels,
désormais LGBT) sont victimes dactes de discrimination
qui entraînent des malaises physiques et émotionnels et
réduisent leurs rendements. Ils y subissent également des
microagressions et des actes dostracisme. Les
microagressions sont des provocations ou des insultes
brèves et subtiles, conscientes ou inconscientes dont les
effets néfastes sont comparables à ceux des « vieilles »
formes de discrimination directe. Quant à lostracisme, cest
un acte dexclusion ou de mise à lécart, qui débouche aussi
sur des conséquences négatives. Contrairement aux actes de
discrimination directement observables, les microagressions
et lostracisme se confondent souvent et sont diff‌iciles à
prouver sur le plan juridique. Dans cet article, nous passons
en revue les travaux sur les microagressions et lostracisme
subis par les LGBT, avant de proposer non seulement des
pratiques visant à favoriser un climat de tolérance au sein
des organisation, mais aussi de nouvelles pistes de
recherche. Copyright © 2017 ASAC. Published by John Wi-
ley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés: microagressions, ostracisme, exclusion, LGBT,
discrimination en milieu professionnel
The workplace continues to become demographically
more diverse in terms of race/ethnicity, gender, and sexual
identity (Paludi, Paludi, & DeSouza, 2011). Although the
United States has formal equality provisions that protect
many minority groups, such as women and racial minorities,
31 states lack policies about discrimination against sexual
orientation and gender identity in the workplace (Lopez,
2015). Many lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
(LGBT) workers experience widespread and persistent em-
ployment discrimination that leads to decreased physical
and emotional well-being, lower wages and career advance-
ment, and lower job satisfaction and productivity (Sears &
Mallory, 2014). We will brief‌ly review research on such
discrimination before identifying newer expressions of
prejudice and discrimination that have emerged as many
organizations and states have erected policies that protect
LGBT workers from blatant discrimination while ignoring
subtle forms. Specif‌ically, we will discuss the literature on
microaggressions and ostracism, two types of negative
*Please address correspondence to: Eros R. DeSouza or Eric D.
Wesselmann, Illinois State University Psychology, Campus Box 4620,
Normal Illinois, 61790 United States. Emails: erdesou@ilstu.edu or
edwesse@ilstu.edu
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de ladministration
34: 121132 (2017)
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1438
Can J Adm Sci
34(2), 121132 (2017)Copyright © 2017 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 121

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT