Wosnack v. Ficych,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Fisher,Fitch,Marchand |
| Citation | 2022 BCCA 139 |
| Date | 14 April 2022 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA47777 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Save-A-Lot Holdings Corporation v Christensen,
...principle, gave no or insufficient weight to relevant considerations, or made an order resulting in a clear injustice: Wosnack v. Ficych, 2022 BCCA 139 at para. 15; Beach Estate v. Beach, 2021 BCCA 238 at para. 26 Additionally, a person applying to cancel a CPL under s. 256 must show that h......
-
2023 BCSC 790,
...the amount of security must never exceed a party's asserted interest in the land in issue. 45 The Court relied on Wosnack v. Ficych, 2022 BCCA 139, which held: [29] I also agree with the appellant that Xiao supports this interpretation. If a CPL must be cancelled under s. 254 where a c......
-
Pan v Liu,
...the amount of security must never exceed a party's asserted interest in the land in issue. 45 The Court relied on Wosnack v. Ficych, 2022 BCCA 139, which held: [29] I also agree with the appellant that Xiao supports this interpretation. If a CPL must be cancelled under s. 254 where a c......
-
2023 BCSC 893,
...Court has discretion to consider the probability of the plaintiff's success in its claim to an interest in land: Wosnack v. Ficych, 2022 BCCA 139, paras. 27 and DISCUSSION 14 The defendants submit that the plaintiff's only claim for an interest in land is the claim in resulting tr......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Save-A-Lot Holdings Corporation v Christensen,
...principle, gave no or insufficient weight to relevant considerations, or made an order resulting in a clear injustice: Wosnack v. Ficych, 2022 BCCA 139 at para. 15; Beach Estate v. Beach, 2021 BCCA 238 at para. 26 Additionally, a person applying to cancel a CPL under s. 256 must show that h......
-
2023 BCSC 790,
...the amount of security must never exceed a party's asserted interest in the land in issue. 45 The Court relied on Wosnack v. Ficych, 2022 BCCA 139, which held: [29] I also agree with the appellant that Xiao supports this interpretation. If a CPL must be cancelled under s. 254 where a c......
-
Pan v Liu,
...the amount of security must never exceed a party's asserted interest in the land in issue. 45 The Court relied on Wosnack v. Ficych, 2022 BCCA 139, which held: [29] I also agree with the appellant that Xiao supports this interpretation. If a CPL must be cancelled under s. 254 where a c......
-
2023 BCSC 893,
...Court has discretion to consider the probability of the plaintiff's success in its claim to an interest in land: Wosnack v. Ficych, 2022 BCCA 139, paras. 27 and DISCUSSION 14 The defendants submit that the plaintiff's only claim for an interest in land is the claim in resulting tr......
Request a trial to view additional results