Wright et al. v. United Parcel Service Canada Ltd.

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeHorkins, J.
Date26 August 2011
Citation2011 ONSC 5044,[2011] O.T.C. Uned. 5044 (SC),[2011] O.T.C. Uned. 5044
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 practice notes
  • Hoy v. Expedia Group Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 28, 2022
    ...41, 47 and 126. [62] Engen v. Hyundai Auto Canada Corp¸ 2021 ABQB 740 at para. 27. [63] Wright v. United Parcel Service Canada Ltd., 2011 ONSC 5044 at para. 101; Blackman v. Fedex Trade Networks Transport & Brokerage (Canada), Inc., 2009 BCSC [64] Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 1 ' 5, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 12, 2025
    ...Procedure, r.21.01(1)(b), Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46, Wright v. United Parcel Service Canada Ltd., 2011 ONSC 5044, aff'd 2015 ONSC 2220 (Div. Ct.), Davis v. Amazon Canada Fulfillment Services, 2025 ONCA 421, Condon v. Canada, 2015 FCA 159, Dewey v. Corner ......
  • Groupe SNC-Lavalin Inc. c. Canada (Service des poursuites pénales)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 8, 2019
    ...from the jurisprudence which are relevant to the current motion and have been applied Canada Ltd, 2011 ONSC 5044, [2011] O.J. noau paragraphe 134, où elle a c......
  • Andriuk et al. v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc., 2013 ABQB 422
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 25, 2013
    ...201; 266 W.A.C. 201; 2002 SCC 19, refd to. [para. 142]. Wright et al. v. United Parcel Service Canada Ltd., [2011] O.T.C. Uned. 5044; 2011 ONSC 5044, refd to. [para. Price et al. v. Panasonic Canada Inc., [2002] O.T.C. 426; 22 C.P.C.(5th) 379 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 153]. Singer v. Sche......
  • Get Started for Free
19 cases
  • Hoy v. Expedia Group Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 28, 2022
    ...41, 47 and 126. [62] Engen v. Hyundai Auto Canada Corp¸ 2021 ABQB 740 at para. 27. [63] Wright v. United Parcel Service Canada Ltd., 2011 ONSC 5044 at para. 101; Blackman v. Fedex Trade Networks Transport & Brokerage (Canada), Inc., 2009 BCSC [64] Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O......
  • Groupe SNC-Lavalin Inc. c. Canada (Service des poursuites pénales)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 8, 2019
    ...from the jurisprudence which are relevant to the current motion and have been applied Canada Ltd, 2011 ONSC 5044, [2011] O.J. noau paragraphe 134, où elle a c......
  • Andriuk et al. v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc., 2013 ABQB 422
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 25, 2013
    ...201; 266 W.A.C. 201; 2002 SCC 19, refd to. [para. 142]. Wright et al. v. United Parcel Service Canada Ltd., [2011] O.T.C. Uned. 5044; 2011 ONSC 5044, refd to. [para. Price et al. v. Panasonic Canada Inc., [2002] O.T.C. 426; 22 C.P.C.(5th) 379 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 153]. Singer v. Sche......
  • Cullaton v. MDG Newmarket Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 6, 2019
    ...v. George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2015 ONCA 921 at paras. 80-81; Wright v. United Parcel Service Canada Ltd., 2011 ONSC 5044 at para.358. [46] Subsections 18(1) and (2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2002 state: (1) Any agreement, whether written, oral or implied, ent......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 1 ' 5, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 12, 2025
    ...Procedure, r.21.01(1)(b), Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46, Wright v. United Parcel Service Canada Ltd., 2011 ONSC 5044, aff'd 2015 ONSC 2220 (Div. Ct.), Davis v. Amazon Canada Fulfillment Services, 2025 ONCA 421, Condon v. Canada, 2015 FCA 159, Dewey v. Corner ......
  • Developments In Class Action Law: Highlights From Q4 2025
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 3, 2026
    ...Finally, the court treated as a persuasive authority the Ontario certification decision of Wright v. United Parcel Service Canada Ltd.,2011 ONSC 5044, aff'd2015 ONSC 2220(Div. Ct.), 336 O.A.C. 21, leave to appeal to Ont. C.A. refused, M45175 (September 18, 2015), leave to appeal refused, [2......