Yankson v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1608

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2019 FC 1608
Date17 December 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Akinyemi-Oguntunde v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 666
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 3, 2020
    ...43; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69 at para 54; Yankson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1608 (CanLII) at para 14). IV. A. Did the RAD err in finding that the RPD did not breach its duty of procedural fairness by failing to inform the......
  • Samra v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 157
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 29, 2020
    ...[10] Questions of procedural fairness afford no deference to the decision-maker (Yankson v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1608 at para 14). IV. Submissions and A. Was the officer’s decision reasonable? (1) Applicant’s Position [11] On my review of the Applicant’s written sub......
  • Almoqaiad v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 160
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 29, 2020
    ...procedural fairness will continue to be assessed without deference to the decision-maker (Yankson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1608 at para 14). IV.  A.  Breaches of Natural Justice and Procedural Fairness [9]  The Applicants’ first argument is that ......
3 cases
  • Akinyemi-Oguntunde v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 666
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 3, 2020
    ...43; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69 at para 54; Yankson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1608 (CanLII) at para 14). IV. A. Did the RAD err in finding that the RPD did not breach its duty of procedural fairness by failing to inform the......
  • Samra v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 157
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 29, 2020
    ...[10] Questions of procedural fairness afford no deference to the decision-maker (Yankson v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1608 at para 14). IV. Submissions and A. Was the officer’s decision reasonable? (1) Applicant’s Position [11] On my review of the Applicant’s written sub......
  • Almoqaiad v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 160
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 29, 2020
    ...procedural fairness will continue to be assessed without deference to the decision-maker (Yankson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1608 at para 14). IV.  A.  Breaches of Natural Justice and Procedural Fairness [9]  The Applicants’ first argument is that ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT