Yashcheshen v Teva Canada Ltd.

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
JudgeCaldwell,Leurer,Ryan-Froslie
Citation2022 SKCA 49
Date18 April 2022
Docket NumberCACV3663

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
47 practice notes
  • Bourgault Industries Ltd. v. Graham
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 28, 2024
    ...not refer to another principle that was engaged in this case. As Ryan-Froslie J.A. recently reiterated in Yashcheshen v Teva Canada Ltd., 2022 SKCA 49, [2022] 8 WWR 60, “where feasible a plaintiff should be given an opportunity to amend their pleadings to correct deficiencies before those p......
  • MacInnis v Bayer Inc.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 20, 2023
    ...including those provided for in class actions, are discretionary decisions that are subject to deference: Yashcheshen v Teva Canada Ltd., 2022 SKCA 49 at para 127, [2022] 8 WWR 60; Thomas v Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority Inc., 2021 SKCA 164 at para 45, 76 CCEL (4th) 37; and Holmes v J......
  • Kuemper v. Attorney General (Canada)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 21, 2025
    ...Court against too readily striking of questionable claims under Rule 7-9. For example, see: Harpold; and Yashcheshen v Teva Canada Ltd., 2022 SKCA 49, [2022] 8 WWR 60. Rules 7-2 & 7-5 Summary Judgment [33] In A.M. v Hagen, 2023 SKKB 176 at paras 55 – 56 [Hagen], Chief Justice Popescul s......
  • Hoedel v WestJet Airlines Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 13, 2023
    ...including those provided for in class actions, are discretionary decisions that are subject to deference: Yashcheshen v Teva Canada Ltd., 2022 SKCA 49 at para 127, [2022] 8 WWR 60; Thomas v Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority Inc., 2021 SKCA 164 at para 45, 76 CCEL (4th) 37; and Holmes v J......
  • Get Started for Free
46 cases
  • Bourgault Industries Ltd. v. Graham
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 28, 2024
    ...not refer to another principle that was engaged in this case. As Ryan-Froslie J.A. recently reiterated in Yashcheshen v Teva Canada Ltd., 2022 SKCA 49, [2022] 8 WWR 60, “where feasible a plaintiff should be given an opportunity to amend their pleadings to correct deficiencies before those p......
  • MacInnis v Bayer Inc.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 20, 2023
    ...including those provided for in class actions, are discretionary decisions that are subject to deference: Yashcheshen v Teva Canada Ltd., 2022 SKCA 49 at para 127, [2022] 8 WWR 60; Thomas v Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority Inc., 2021 SKCA 164 at para 45, 76 CCEL (4th) 37; and Holmes v J......
  • Kuemper v. Attorney General (Canada)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 21, 2025
    ...Court against too readily striking of questionable claims under Rule 7-9. For example, see: Harpold; and Yashcheshen v Teva Canada Ltd., 2022 SKCA 49, [2022] 8 WWR 60. Rules 7-2 & 7-5 Summary Judgment [33] In A.M. v Hagen, 2023 SKKB 176 at paras 55 – 56 [Hagen], Chief Justice Popescul s......
  • Hoedel v WestJet Airlines Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 13, 2023
    ...including those provided for in class actions, are discretionary decisions that are subject to deference: Yashcheshen v Teva Canada Ltd., 2022 SKCA 49 at para 127, [2022] 8 WWR 60; Thomas v Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority Inc., 2021 SKCA 164 at para 45, 76 CCEL (4th) 37; and Holmes v J......
  • Get Started for Free