Zatreanu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 472
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 472 |
| Date | 02 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Cova Torres v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1672
...2008 FCA 84; Mete v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 840; Zatreanu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 472, at para 17). The applicant submitted that the RAD’s conclusion on this issue was not properly justified in its reasons (citing Bledy v. C......
-
Jean Philippe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 48
...the RAD fail to consider any of the Applicant’s allegations as part of its assessment (Zatreanu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 472 at para 17). [19] Furthermore, this is not the type of situation that was addressed in Mete, where no reasons are provided to explain why a lon......
2 cases
-
Cova Torres v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1672
...2008 FCA 84; Mete v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 840; Zatreanu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 472, at para 17). The applicant submitted that the RAD’s conclusion on this issue was not properly justified in its reasons (citing Bledy v. C......
-
Jean Philippe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 48
...the RAD fail to consider any of the Applicant’s allegations as part of its assessment (Zatreanu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 472 at para 17). [19] Furthermore, this is not the type of situation that was addressed in Mete, where no reasons are provided to explain why a lon......