Zhao v. Ochitwa,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Fitzpatrick |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 535 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S218020 |
| Date | 04 April 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 183,
...there must be “at the very least, some reasonable explanation” as to why the notice was not received: Zhao v. Ochitwa, 2022 BCSC 535 at para. 43. But if there is objective evidence that the correspondence was not received because of a proven communication failure, it is the se......
-
Century Industries Ltd v British Columbia (Assessor of Area #11 — Richmond/Delta),
...there must be “at the very least, some reasonable explanation” as to why the notice was not received: Zhao v. Ochitwa, 2022 BCSC 535 at para. 43. But if there is objective evidence that the correspondence was not received because of a proven communication failure, it is the se......
2 cases
-
2023 BCSC 183,
...there must be “at the very least, some reasonable explanation” as to why the notice was not received: Zhao v. Ochitwa, 2022 BCSC 535 at para. 43. But if there is objective evidence that the correspondence was not received because of a proven communication failure, it is the se......
-
Century Industries Ltd v British Columbia (Assessor of Area #11 — Richmond/Delta),
...there must be “at the very least, some reasonable explanation” as to why the notice was not received: Zhao v. Ochitwa, 2022 BCSC 535 at para. 43. But if there is objective evidence that the correspondence was not received because of a proven communication failure, it is the se......