Zmari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132

CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 04, 2016
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2016 FC 132
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
36 practice notes
  • Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...an oral hearing is a procedural fairness issue and as such the correctness standard applies: Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 [Zmari] at paras 10-13; Nadarajan v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12-17; Nur v Canada (Citizensh......
  • Onyekweli-Ugeh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 25, 2021
    ...of procedural fairness, to be reviewed on the correctness standard: see, for instance, Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132, at paras 10–13; Nadarajan v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403, at paras 12–17; Nur v Canada (Citizensh......
  • Pierre v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1524
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 9, 2022
    ...that the letters “seem self-serving:” see Hamza at paras 38-39, and Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 at para 21. To be clear, I am not suggesting that a concern about self-serving evidence standing alone triggers procedural fairness rights. If properly......
  • Sallai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 446
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 11, 2019
    ...the application of the Act and Regulations, the standard of reasonableness applies. [26] In Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 at para 13, [2016] FCJ No 106 (QL) [Zmari], Justice Boswell noted that the jurisprudence is split on whether the decision to proceed withou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
36 cases
  • Sundralingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1768
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...an oral hearing is a procedural fairness issue and as such the correctness standard applies: Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 [Zmari] at paras 10-13; Nadarajan v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403 at paras 12-17; Nur v Canada (Citizensh......
  • Pierre v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1524
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 9, 2022
    ...that the letters “seem self-serving:” see Hamza at paras 38-39, and Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 at para 21. To be clear, I am not suggesting that a concern about self-serving evidence standing alone triggers procedural fairness rights. If properly......
  • Onyekweli-Ugeh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 25, 2021
    ...of procedural fairness, to be reviewed on the correctness standard: see, for instance, Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132, at paras 10–13; Nadarajan v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 403, at paras 12–17; Nur v Canada (Citizensh......
  • Sallai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 446
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 11, 2019
    ...the application of the Act and Regulations, the standard of reasonableness applies. [26] In Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 at para 13, [2016] FCJ No 106 (QL) [Zmari], Justice Boswell noted that the jurisprudence is split on whether the decision to proceed withou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT