A.A.M. v. R.P.K., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 930
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Pazaratz, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW |
| Citation | [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 930,2010 ONSC 930,[2010] O.T.C. Uned. 930 (SC) |
| Date | 01 March 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...discretion in trial judges to assess the weight to 363 364 365 366 support vitiated where wife not legally represented); AAM v RPK, 2010 ONSC 930 at paras See Nicholl v Nicholl, 2020 BCCA 173. DKN v MJO, [2003] BCJ No 2164 (CA); RSM v MSM, [2006] BCJ No 1756 (CA); AAM v RPK, 2010 ONSC 930; ......
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...see also Rogerson v Rogerson, [2004] NSJ No 152 (SC) (waiver of spousal support vitiated where wife not legally represented); AAM v RPK, 2010 ONSC 930 at paras Canadian family law original intention of the spouses and whether it is still in compliance with the overall objectives of the Divo......
-
A.E v. A.E.,
...impact the decision as to whether a recipient should benefit from the payor’s post-separation income increases (A.A.M. v. R.P.K., 2010 ONSC 930 (S.C.J.); Kohan; T.N.F. v. M.V.J.A., 2018 ONSC 3310 (S.C.J.)). Nonetheless, the circumstances of each case must be carefully considere......
-
Want v. Gauthier,
...impact the decision as to whether a recipient should benefit from the payor's post-separation income increases (A.A.M. v. R.P.K., 2010 ONSC 930 (S.C.J.); Kohan v. Kohan, 2016 ABCA 125 (C.A.); T.N.F. v. M.V.J.A., 2018 ONSC 3310 (S.C.J.)). Nonetheless, the circumstances of each case must......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
A.E v. A.E.,
...impact the decision as to whether a recipient should benefit from the payor’s post-separation income increases (A.A.M. v. R.P.K., 2010 ONSC 930 (S.C.J.); Kohan; T.N.F. v. M.V.J.A., 2018 ONSC 3310 (S.C.J.)). Nonetheless, the circumstances of each case must be carefully considere......
-
Want v. Gauthier,
...impact the decision as to whether a recipient should benefit from the payor's post-separation income increases (A.A.M. v. R.P.K., 2010 ONSC 930 (S.C.J.); Kohan v. Kohan, 2016 ABCA 125 (C.A.); T.N.F. v. M.V.J.A., 2018 ONSC 3310 (S.C.J.)). Nonetheless, the circumstances of each case must......
-
Thompson v. Thompson,
...56. Kerr v. Baranow, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 269 (S.C.C.). 57. See also Fisher v. Fisher, Supra. 58. See para. 212. 59. A.A.M. v. R.P.K., 2010 ONSC 930 (S.C.J.); Rockall v. Rockall, 2010 ABCA 278 (C.A.); Chapman v. Chapman, 2010 CarswellOnt 2343 (S.C.J.); Greenglass v. Greenglass, 2010 ONCA 675 (C.......
-
Virc v. Blair,
...caused by the husband's eagerness to resolve matters quickly, and lack of independent legal advice. [86] The court in A.A.M. v. R.P.K ., 2010 ONSC 930, 81 R.F.L. (6th) 370, at para. 148, reviewed the common law requirements for a finding of both duress and undue influence, as follows: The R......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...discretion in trial judges to assess the weight to 363 364 365 366 support vitiated where wife not legally represented); AAM v RPK, 2010 ONSC 930 at paras See Nicholl v Nicholl, 2020 BCCA 173. DKN v MJO, [2003] BCJ No 2164 (CA); RSM v MSM, [2006] BCJ No 1756 (CA); AAM v RPK, 2010 ONSC 930; ......
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...see also Rogerson v Rogerson, [2004] NSJ No 152 (SC) (waiver of spousal support vitiated where wife not legally represented); AAM v RPK, 2010 ONSC 930 at paras Canadian family law original intention of the spouses and whether it is still in compliance with the overall objectives of the Divo......