AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 251
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf,The Honourable Madam Justice Elizabeth Hughes,The Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 251 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2003-0087-AC |
| Date | 25 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
AC and JF v Alberta,
...this decision may have “incorrectly modified and created a more stringent test” for an interim injunction: see A.C. and J.F. v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 251 at para. 4. There is, however, no reason to reconsider the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees decision. That decision did not and could no......
-
AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309
...Union of Provincial Employees v Alberta, 2019 ABCA 320 [AUPE 2019] reconsidered in the context of this appeal: AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 251 [the Reconsideration Decision]. [6] In its factum, Alberta condenses its grounds of appeal to five principal arguments on how the chambers judge ......
-
Peters v Atchooay,
...case was “wrongly decided; it is only our job to determine whether [it] should be reconsidered”: AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 251 at para 5; Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2020 ABCA 31 at para 6 [Deluca]. As a general rule, leave to reconsider a binding precedent ȁ......
-
Lawrence v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
...case was “wrongly decided; … only … to determine whether [it] should be reconsidered”: AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 251, para 5; Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2020 ABCA 31, para 6, 97 Alta LR (6th) 291. As a general rule, leave to reconsider a binding pre......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
AC and JF v Alberta,
...this decision may have “incorrectly modified and created a more stringent test” for an interim injunction: see A.C. and J.F. v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 251 at para. 4. There is, however, no reason to reconsider the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees decision. That decision did not and could no......
-
AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 309
...Union of Provincial Employees v Alberta, 2019 ABCA 320 [AUPE 2019] reconsidered in the context of this appeal: AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 251 [the Reconsideration Decision]. [6] In its factum, Alberta condenses its grounds of appeal to five principal arguments on how the chambers judge ......
-
Peters v Atchooay,
...case was “wrongly decided; it is only our job to determine whether [it] should be reconsidered”: AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 251 at para 5; Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2020 ABCA 31 at para 6 [Deluca]. As a general rule, leave to reconsider a binding precedent ȁ......
-
Lawrence v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
...case was “wrongly decided; … only … to determine whether [it] should be reconsidered”: AC and JF v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 251, para 5; Edmonton (Police Service) v Deluca, 2020 ABCA 31, para 6, 97 Alta LR (6th) 291. As a general rule, leave to reconsider a binding pre......
Request a trial to view additional results