Aecon Buildings v. Brampton (City) et al., [2011] N.R. Uned. 68 (SCC)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Binnie, Abella, and Rothstein, JJ. |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Citation | [2011] N.R. Uned. 68 (SCC),[2011] N.R. Uned. 68,2011 SCC 33,[2011] 2 SCR 560,[2011] SCJ No 33 (QL),[2011] ACS no 33 |
| Date | 23 June 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
13 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 13 ' 17, 2022)
...of Halton, 2022 ONSC 2199, Endean v. St. Joseph's General Hospital, 2019 ONCA 181, Aecon Buildings v. Stephenson Engineering Ltd., 2011 SCC 33, Pettey v. Avis Car Inc. (1993), 13 O.R. (3d) 725 (Gen. Div.), Laudon v. Roberts, 2009 ONCA 383 Talotta v Talotta, 2022 ONCA 474 Keywords: Family La......
-
R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5
...the interpretation of the count charged, thus possibly engaging the concepts discussed in Aecon Buildings v Stephenson Engineering Ltd., 2011 SCC 33 at paras 4 to 8, [2011] 2 SCR 560 respecting admissibility of new evidence to support a leave motion. It is not, in my view, necessary to dwel......
-
Gilead Sciences Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health) et al., 2012 FC 2
...exception to patent infringement in relation to pharmaceutical patents: AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v Canada (Minister of Health), 2006 SCC 49, 2 SCR 560 at para 15. They also agree that a key consideration in interpreting the listing requirements under the PM (NOC) Regulations is the concept o......
-
Bioriginal Food & Science Corp. et al. v. Gerspacher et al., 2012 SKQB 469
...(City) et al., [2010] O.A.C. Uned. 727; 328 D.L.R.(4th) 488; 2010 ONCA 898, affd. [2011] N.R. Uned. 68; [2011] O.A.C. Uned. 585; [2011] 2 S.C.R. 560; 2011 SCC 33, refd to. [para. Sable Offshore Energy Inc. et al. v. Ameron International Corp. et al. (2011), 310 N.S.R.(2d) 382; 983 A.P.R. 38......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
R v Lofstrom, 2018 ABCA 5
...the interpretation of the count charged, thus possibly engaging the concepts discussed in Aecon Buildings v Stephenson Engineering Ltd., 2011 SCC 33 at paras 4 to 8, [2011] 2 SCR 560 respecting admissibility of new evidence to support a leave motion. It is not, in my view, necessary to dwel......
-
Gilead Sciences Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health) et al., 2012 FC 2
...exception to patent infringement in relation to pharmaceutical patents: AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v Canada (Minister of Health), 2006 SCC 49, 2 SCR 560 at para 15. They also agree that a key consideration in interpreting the listing requirements under the PM (NOC) Regulations is the concept o......
-
Bioriginal Food & Science Corp. et al. v. Gerspacher et al., 2012 SKQB 469
...(City) et al., [2010] O.A.C. Uned. 727; 328 D.L.R.(4th) 488; 2010 ONCA 898, affd. [2011] N.R. Uned. 68; [2011] O.A.C. Uned. 585; [2011] 2 S.C.R. 560; 2011 SCC 33, refd to. [para. Sable Offshore Energy Inc. et al. v. Ameron International Corp. et al. (2011), 310 N.S.R.(2d) 382; 983 A.P.R. 38......
-
Bilfinger Berger (Canada) Inc. et al. v. Greater Vancouver Water District et al., 2014 BCSC 1560
...Canada picked up on this important point in dismissing a motion by Aecon to adduce fresh evidence on an application for leave to appeal: 2011 SCC 33; [2011] 2 S.C.R. 560 . Mr. Justice Binnie described the issue as follows at para. 2: The leave application concerns a " Mary Carter -type agr......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 13 ' 17, 2022)
...of Halton, 2022 ONSC 2199, Endean v. St. Joseph's General Hospital, 2019 ONCA 181, Aecon Buildings v. Stephenson Engineering Ltd., 2011 SCC 33, Pettey v. Avis Car Inc. (1993), 13 O.R. (3d) 725 (Gen. Div.), Laudon v. Roberts, 2009 ONCA 383 Talotta v Talotta, 2022 ONCA 474 Keywords: Family La......