ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN v. AN, 2016 SKQB 378
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | BARRINGTON-FOOTE J. |
| Citation | 2016 SKQB 378 |
| Docket Number | CRM 126 of 2015 |
| Subject Matter | CIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 21 November 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R v Pawlivsky, 2020 SKCA 75
...be found to have occurred, by following the analysis of Barrington‑Foote J. (as he then was) in Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v An, 2016 SKQB 378, 4 MVR (7th) 217 [An]. However, An dealt with a very different situation. That case involved the question as to whether a s. 10(b) violation co......
-
BINKLEY v. R.,
...not accept that position and note, in particular, the authorities cited at paragraphs 20 and 21 of Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v An, 2016 SKQB 378, 4 MVR (7th) 217 [An]. In An, the Court identified the following guiding principles and considerations when assessing whether police ha......
-
R v Haque,
...previously considered by this Court. Justice Barrington-Foote (as he then was) referred to it in Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v An, 2016 SKQB 378, 4 MVR (7th) 217, but did not expressly apply it. The Quebec Court of Appeal spoke approvingly of Edgar in Dubourg c R, 2018 QCCA 1999, but co......
-
R. v. Baillie, 2019 SKPC 6
...475 Sask R 58 [Ross] [4] (1977), 38 CCC (2d) 148 (Ont CA) [5] (1989), 81 Sask R 165 (Sask QB) [6] (1972), 6 CCC (2d) 425 (Sask CA) [7] 2016 SKQB 378; foll’d R v Janzen, oral, unreported; contra R v Weese, 2017 SKPC 077 [Weese], which distinguished An on the facts. [8] R v Thomsen, [1988] 1 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R v Pawlivsky, 2020 SKCA 75
...be found to have occurred, by following the analysis of Barrington‑Foote J. (as he then was) in Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v An, 2016 SKQB 378, 4 MVR (7th) 217 [An]. However, An dealt with a very different situation. That case involved the question as to whether a s. 10(b) violation co......
-
BINKLEY v. R., 2020 SKQB 323
...not accept that position and note, in particular, the authorities cited at paragraphs 20 and 21 of Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v An, 2016 SKQB 378, 4 MVR (7th) 217 [An]. In An, the Court identified the following guiding principles and considerations when assessing whether police ha......
-
R v Haque, 2022 SKCA 124
...previously considered by this Court. Justice Barrington-Foote (as he then was) referred to it in Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v An, 2016 SKQB 378, 4 MVR (7th) 217, but did not expressly apply it. The Quebec Court of Appeal spoke approvingly of Edgar in Dubourg c R, 2018 QCCA 1999, but co......
-
R. v. Baillie, 2019 SKPC 6
...475 Sask R 58 [Ross] [4] (1977), 38 CCC (2d) 148 (Ont CA) [5] (1989), 81 Sask R 165 (Sask QB) [6] (1972), 6 CCC (2d) 425 (Sask CA) [7] 2016 SKQB 378; foll’d R v Janzen, oral, unreported; contra R v Weese, 2017 SKPC 077 [Weese], which distinguished An on the facts. [8] R v Thomsen, [1988] 1 ......
Request a trial to view additional results