Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Catherine Fraser,The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz |
| Citation | 2018 ABCA 147 |
| Docket Number | 1601-0176-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 26 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 practice notes
-
Balogun v Pandher, 2021 ABCA 422
...is owed deference and an appellate court will only intervene where that decision is unreasonable: Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147 at para 67, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd [2018] SCCA No 256. See also, Telsec Developments Ltd v Abstak Holdings Inc, 2020 ABCA 40 at para......
-
R v Conway-McDowall, 2019 ABQB 11
...been consistently applied since Rizzo and was recently emphasized by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147. In ENMAX the Court explained at para ... A court must consider not only the textual wording of the statutory provision in dispute but also t......
-
R v Matchatis,
...is not to be disturbed absent palpable and overriding error: R v Mufuta, 2020 ABCA 79 at para 23; Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147 at para 67, leave to appeal ref’d [2018] SCCA No 256; Baker v Poucette, 2017 ABCA 344 at para 12; R v Nqumayo, 2010 ABCA 100 at para 19. Assess......
-
R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13
...matter how plain the disposition may seem upon initial reading”. [8] The Alberta Court of Appeal in Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147, also emphasized the importance of context in statutory interpretation and, specifically, the need to consider the purpose of the statutory p......
Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
-
Yao v. The King, 2024 TCC 19
...Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes, supra at para 21. [25] La Presse Inc v Quebec, 2023 SCC 22. [26] Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation [ENMAX], 2018 ABCA 147 at para 70. [27] ENMAX, supra. [28] ENMAX supra at para 70. [29] ENMAX, supra at para 25, citing Electric Utilities Act, SA 2003, c E-5.1, subs......
-
Balogun v Pandher, 2021 ABCA 422
...is owed deference and an appellate court will only intervene where that decision is unreasonable: Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147 at para 67, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd [2018] SCCA No 256. See also, Telsec Developments Ltd v Abstak Holdings Inc, 2020 ABCA 40 at para......
-
R v Conway-McDowall, 2019 ABQB 11
...been consistently applied since Rizzo and was recently emphasized by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147. In ENMAX the Court explained at para ... A court must consider not only the textual wording of the statutory provision in dispute but also t......
-
R v Matchatis,
...is not to be disturbed absent palpable and overriding error: R v Mufuta, 2020 ABCA 79 at para 23; Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147 at para 67, leave to appeal ref’d [2018] SCCA No 256; Baker v Poucette, 2017 ABCA 344 at para 12; R v Nqumayo, 2010 ABCA 100 at para 19. Assess......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Update On The Enmax Case: A 'Reasonable' Outcome?
...continue to monitor developments in this area and keep you updated through our bulletins. Footnotes 1 Alberta v ENMAX Energy Corporation, 2018 ABCA 147. 2 The Balancing Pool itself was established as a statutory corporation under s75(1) of the Utilities Act for the benefit of Alberta electr......