Amchem Products Inc. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), (1993) 150 N.R. 321 (SCC)
Judge | Cory and McLachlin, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court of Canada |
Case Date | Monday May 25, 1992 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1993), 150 N.R. 321 (SCC);1993 CanLII 124 (SCC);[1993] 1 SCR 897;39 WAC 1;[1993] CarswellBC 47;102 DLR (4th) 96;150 NR 321;39 ACWS (3d) 600;[1993] SCJ No 34 (QL);77 BCLR (2d) 62;14 CPC (3d) 1;[1993] 3 WWR 441;23 BCAC 1;JE 93-674 |
Amchem Products Inc. v. WCB (1993), 150 N.R. 321 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
....................
Workers' Compensation Board et al. (appellants) v. Amchem Products Inc. et al. (respondents)
and
Workers' Compensation Board et al. (appellants) v. T & N plc (respondent)
and
Workers' Compensation Board et al. (appellants) v. The Flintkote Company (respondent)
(22256)
Indexed As: Amchem Products Inc. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.)
Supreme Court of Canada
La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier,
Cory and McLachlin, JJ.
March 25, 1993.
Summary:
194 claimants sued several asbestos companies in Texas for damages in negligence, primarily alleging failure as manufacturers to notify and warn users of the dangers of asbestos products. The claimants were people injured by exposure to asbestos or dependants of deceased people affected by asbestos and most were residents of British Columbia at pertinent times; although some were residents of Alberta, Manitoba, New Brunswick and Washington State. In all but 40 claims the B.C. Workers' Compensation Board had a subrogated interest. Most of the companies were incorporated and based in the United States and most carried on manufacturing business in Texas; although none was incorporated there. None had a connection with British Columbia.
The Texas court affirmed their jurisdiction over the action. The companies then applied in British Columbia for an injunction to prevent continuation of the claimants' Texas suit and claimed abuse of process.
The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a judgment reported [1990] 2 W.W.R. 601; 42 B.C.L.R.(2d) 77; 65 D.L.R.(4th) 567; 38 C.P.C.(2d) 232, granted the anti-suit injunction, but struck out the claim for abuse of process. The claimants appealed.
The British Columbia Court of Appeal, in a judgment reported [1991] 1 W.W.R. 243; 50 B.C.L.R.(2d) 218; 75 D.L.R.(4th) 1; 44 C.P.C.(2d) 1, dismissed the appeal, but affirmed the striking out of the abuse of process claim. The claimants appealed.
The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal and set aside the anti-suit injunction, reviewing the British, American and Canadian law and defining the modern Canadian position in the process.
Conflict of Laws - Topic 9303
Practice - Injunctions - To enjoin foreign proceedings - The Supreme Court of Canada reviewed the historical and current legal positions in Britain, the United States, Australia and Canada on the issue of anti-suit injunctions respecting foreign actions (see paragraphs 35 to 50) before prescribing a Canadian rule (see paragraphs 51 to 56).
Conflict of Laws - Topic 9303
Practice - Injunctions - To enjoin foreign proceedings - Anti-suit injunction - The Supreme Court of Canada held: "...when a foreign court assumes jurisdiction on a basis that generally conforms to our rule of private international law relating to the forum non conveniens, that decision will be respected and a Canadian court will not purport to make the decision for the foreign court. The policy of our courts with respect to comity demands no less. If, however, a foreign court assumes jurisdiction on a basis that is inconsistent with our rules of private international law and an injustice results to a litigant or 'would-be' litigant in our courts, then the assumption of jurisdiction is inequitable and the party invoking the foreign jurisdiction can be restrained."
Conflict of Laws - Topic 9303
Practice - Injunctions - To enjoin foreign proceedings - 194 claimants, mostly B.C. residents, sued U.S.-based asbestos manufacturers in Texas, where the manufacturers had plants, claiming damages for negligent failure to notify and warn users of asbestos risks - The manufacturers had no connection with B.C., but successfully applied there for an injunction to prevent continuation of the Texas suit - The Supreme Court of Canada set aside the injunction, where the Texas court assumed jurisdiction upon a basis consistent with the Canadian law of forum non conveniens and the manufacturers failed to show that continuation of the Texas proceedings would unjustly deprive them of a legitimate juridical advantage - See paragraphs 57 to 63.
Cases Noticed:
Hunt v. T & N plc et al., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959; 117 N.R. 321; 74 D.L.R.(4th) 321; [1990] 6 W.W.R. 385; 4 C.C.L.T.(2d) 1; 43 C.P.C.(2d) 105; 49 B.C.L.R.(2d) 273, refd to. [para. 5].
Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc. - see Hunt v. T & N plc et al.
Dow Chemical Co. v. Alfaro (1990), 786 S.W.2d 674 (Tex.), cert. denied 59 U.S.L.W. 3460, refd to. [para. 7].
Castanho v. Brown & Root (U.K.) Ltd., [1981] A.C. 557; [1981] 1 All E.R. 143; [1980] 3 W.L.R. 991; [1981] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 113; 124 Sol. Jo. 884 (H.L.), consd. [paras. 13, 36].
Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. Lee Kui Jak, [1987] 3 All E.R. 510; [1987] A.C. 871; [1987] 3 W.L.R. 59; 84 L.S. Gaz. 2048 (P.C.), appld. [paras. 13, 37, 50].
SNI - see Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale.
Antares Shipping Corp. v. Ship Capricorn et al., [1977] 2 S.C.R. 422; 7 N.R. 518, refd to. [para. 20].
Bushby v. Munday, [1814-23] All E.R. Rep. 304; 5 Madd. 297; 56 E.R. 908, consd. [paras. 20, 35].
Laker Airways v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines (1984), 731 F.2d 909 (D.C.F.C.A.), appld. [paras. 23, 39].
Morguard Investments Ltd. et al. v. De Savoye, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077; 122 N.R. 81; [1991] 2 W.W.R. 217; 46 C.P.C.(2d) 1; 52 B.C.L.R.(2d) 160; 15 R.P.R.(2d) 1; 76 D.L.R.(4th) 256, appld. [paras. 23, 50].
Spiliada Maritime Corp. v. Cansulex Ltd., [1987] A.C. 460; 71 N.R. 372; [1986] 3 All E.R. 843; [1987] 1 F.T.L.R. 103; [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1; [1987] E.C.C. 168; 130 Sol. Jo. 925; 84 L.S. Gaz. 113; 136 New L.J. 1137 (H.L.), appld. [para. 26].
Ship Atlantic Star; Atlantic Star (Owners) v. Bona Spes (Owners), [1973] 2 All E.R. 175; [1974] A.C. 436; [1973] 2 W.L.R. 795; 117 Sol. Jo. 371 (H.L.), consd. [paras. 27, 36].
Rockware Glass Ltd. v. MacShannon; Redpath Dorman Long Ltd. v. Fythe; British Steel Corp. v. Jardine; Stone Manganese Marine Ltd. v. Patterson, [1978] 2 W.L.R. 362; [1978] A.C. 795; [1978] 1 All E.R. 625; 122 Sol. Jo. 81 (H.L.), consd. [para. 27].
De Dampierre v. De Dampierre, [1987] 2 W.L.R. 1006; [1988] A.C. 92; 131 Sol. Jo. 471; [1987] 2 All E.R. 1; [1987] 2 F.L.R. 300; 17 Fam. Law 418; 84 L.S. Gaz. 1493 (H.L.), consd. [para. 29].
Voth v. Manildra Flour Mills Pty. Ltd. (1990), 65 A.L.J.R. 83 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 30].
Club Méditerranée N.Z. v. Wendell, [1989] 1 N.Z.L.R. 216 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 30].
Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno (1981), 454 U.S. 235 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 30].
St. Pierre v. South American Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd., [1936] 1 K.B. 382; [1935] All E.R. Rep. 408; 105 L.J.K.B. 436; 154 L.T. 546 (C.A.), consd. [paras. 32, 36, 37].
Avenue Properties Ltd. v. First City Development Corp., [1987] 1 W.W.R. 249; 32 D.L.R.(4th) 40; 7 B.C.L.R.(2d) 45 (C.A.), appld. [para. 33].
British Airways Board v. Laker Airways Ltd., [1985] A.C. 58; [1984] 3 W.L.R. 413; 128 Sol. Jo. 531; [1984] 3 All E.R. 39; [1984] L.M.C.L.Q. 563; [1985] E.C.C. 49; 134 New L.J. 746; 81 L.S. Gaz. 2849 (H.L.), consd. [para. 36].
South Carolina Insurance Co. v. Assurantie Maatshappij De Zeven Provincien N.V.; South Carolina Insurance Co. v. Al Ahlia Insurance Co., [1987] A.C. 24; [1986] 3 W.L.R. 398; 130 Sol. Jo. 634; [1986] 3 All E.R. 487; [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 317; 136 New L.J. 751; 83 L.S. Gaz. 2659 (H.L.), consd. [para. 36].
Cole v. Cunningham (1890), 133 U.S. 107, consd. [para. 39].
Unterweser Reederei, GmbH v. M/S Bremen (1970), 428 F.2d 888 (5th Cir.), consd. [para. 41].
Gau Shan Co. v. Bankers Trust Co. (1992), 956 F.2d 1349 (6th Cir.), consd. [para. 41].
National Mutual Holdings Pty. Ltd. v. Sentry Corp. (1989), 87 A.L.R. 539 (F.C. Gen. Div.), consd. [para. 43].
Pioneer Concrete (Vic) Pty. Ltd. v. Trade Practices Commission (1982), 152 C.L.R. 460, refd to. [para. 43].
Cooper Estate v. Canadian Home Assurance Co. (1986), 73 N.S.R.(2d) 230; 176 A.P.R. 230; 10 C.P.C.(2d) 195; 18 C.C.L.I. 279; 29 D.L.R.(4th) 419 (C.A.), consd. [para. 46].
Rowan Cos. v. DiPersio (1990), 96 N.S.R.(2d) 181; 253 A.P.R. 181; 69 D.L.R.(4th) 224 (C.A.), consd. [para. 46].
Allied-Signal Inc. v. Dome Petroleum Ltd., [1989] 5 W.W.R. 326; 67 Alta. L.R.(2d) 259 (Q.B.), consd. [para. 47].
Kornberg v. Kornberg, [1991] 2 W.W.R. 594; 70 Man.R.(2d) 182; 47 C.P.C.(2d) 58; 76 D.L.R.(4th) 379; 30 R.F.L.(3d) 238 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused [1991] 1 S.C.R. x, consd. [para. 48].
Aikmac Holdings Ltd. v. Loewen, [1989] 6 W.W.R. 759; 66 Man.R.(2d) 295 (C.A.), consd. [para. 48].
Pennoyer v. Neff (1877), 95 U.S. 714, consd. [para. 60].
International Shoe Co. v. Washington (1945), 326 U.S. 310, consd. [para. 60].
Milliken v. Meyer (1940), 311 U.S. 457, consd. [para. 60].
Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia v. Hall (1984), 466 U.S. 408, consd. [para. 60].
Statutes Noticed:
Civil Procedure and Remedies Code (Texas), sect. 71.031 [para. 6].
Constitution of the United States, Fourteenth Amendment, sect. 1 [para. 60].
Law and Equity Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 224, sect. 36 [para. 54].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Black, Vaughan, The Standard for Issuing Antisuit Injunctions in Canada (1991), 44 C.P.C.(2d) 30, pp. 31-32 [para. 60].
Dicey and Morris, The Conflict of Laws (11th Ed. 1987), vol. 1, p. 391 [para. 2].
Edinger, Elizabeth R., Conflict of Laws - Jurisdiction - British Columbia Residents Bringing Action for Damages in Texas Against Non British Columbia Resident Defendants - Defendants Seeking Anti-Suit Injunction in British Columbia: Amchem Products v. Workers' Compensation Board (Case Comment) (1992), 71 Can. Bar Rev. 117, p. 127 [para. 51].
Hayes, Ellen L., Forum Non Conveniens in England, Australia and Japan: The Allocation of Jurisdiction in Transnational Litigation (1992), 26 U.B.C. L. Rev. 41, pp. 42-43 [para. 31]; 63 [para. 34].
Raushenbush, Richard W., Antisuit Injunctions and International Comity (1985), 71 Va. L. Rev. 1039, generally [para. 24]; pp. 1049-1050 [para. 41].
White and Tudor, Leading Cases in Equity (9th Ed.), vol. 1, pp. 635-636 [para. 43].
Counsel:
J.J. Camp, Q.C., Patrick G. Foy and J. Fiorante, for the appellants;
Bryan Williams, Q.C., and Terrance A. Kowalchuk, for the respondents, Amchem Products Inc. et al.;
James A. Macaulay, Q.C., and Kenneth N. Affleck, for the respondent, T & N plc.
Solicitors of Record:
Ladner, Downs, Vancouver, British Columbia, for the appellants;
Swinton & Co., Vancouver, British Columbia, for the respondents, Amchem Products Inc. et al.;
Macaulay & Co., Vancouver, British Columbia, for the respondent, T & N plc.;
Edwards, Kenny & Bray, Vancouver, British Columbia, for the respondent, Flintkote Co.
This appeal was heard on May 25, 1992, before La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory and McLachlin, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada. On March 25, 1993, Sopinka, J. delivered the following judgment for the court in both official languages.
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Holt Cargo Systems Inc. v. ABC Containerline N.V. (Trustees of), [2001] 3 SCR 907
...Bulkcarriers, N.V. (Re), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 951, 2001 SCC 91; Amchem Products Inc. v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897; In re Treco, 240 F.3d 148 (2001); Laane and Baltser v. Estonian State Cargo & Passenger Steamship Line, [1949] S.C.R. 530; Q.N.S. Paper......
-
Unifund Assurance Co. v. ICBC, (2003) 306 N.R. 201 (SCC)
...135 O.A.C. 135; 50 O.R.(3d) 109 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 133]. Amchem Products Inc. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897; 150 N.R. 321; 23 B.C.A.C. 1; 39 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. Avenue Properties Ltd. v. First City Development Corp. (1986), 32 D.L.R.(4th) 40 (B......
-
Vujicic v Estate of Leona Donna MacEachern, 2022 ABCA 263
...it may be exercised by suing in another jurisdiction”) & Amchem Products Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Bd., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897, 905 per Sopinka, J. (“194 persons who have suffered injury which they claim is due to exposure to asbestos or who are dependents of decease......
-
Van Breda v. Village Resorts Limited, 2010 ONCA 84
...77 O.A.C. 81; 51 B.C.A.C. 241; 84 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 42]. Amchem Products Inc. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897; 150 N.R. 321; 23 B.C.A.C. 1; 39 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. Pro Swing Inc. v. Elta Golf Inc., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 612; 354 N.R. 201; 218 O.A.C......
-
Holt Cargo Systems Inc. v. ABC Containerline N.V. (Trustees of), [2001] 3 SCR 907
...Bulkcarriers, N.V. (Re), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 951, 2001 SCC 91; Amchem Products Inc. v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897; In re Treco, 240 F.3d 148 (2001); Laane and Baltser v. Estonian State Cargo & Passenger Steamship Line, [1949] S.C.R. 530; Q.N.S. Paper......
-
Unifund Assurance Co. v. ICBC, (2003) 306 N.R. 201 (SCC)
...135 O.A.C. 135; 50 O.R.(3d) 109 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 133]. Amchem Products Inc. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897; 150 N.R. 321; 23 B.C.A.C. 1; 39 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. Avenue Properties Ltd. v. First City Development Corp. (1986), 32 D.L.R.(4th) 40 (B......
-
Vujicic v Estate of Leona Donna MacEachern, 2022 ABCA 263
...it may be exercised by suing in another jurisdiction”) & Amchem Products Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Bd., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897, 905 per Sopinka, J. (“194 persons who have suffered injury which they claim is due to exposure to asbestos or who are dependents of decease......
-
Van Breda v. Village Resorts Limited, 2010 ONCA 84
...77 O.A.C. 81; 51 B.C.A.C. 241; 84 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 42]. Amchem Products Inc. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897; 150 N.R. 321; 23 B.C.A.C. 1; 39 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. Pro Swing Inc. v. Elta Golf Inc., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 612; 354 N.R. 201; 218 O.A.C......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (DECEMBER 12, 2022 – DECEMBER 16, 2022)
...(Litigation Guardian of) v. (Gagnon), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022, Amchem Products Inc. v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897, Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje, 2015 SCC 42, Kaynes v. BP, plc, 2014 ONCA 580, Kaynes v. BP, plc, 2016 ONCA 601, Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. v. Ll......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 12, 2022 ' December 16, 2022)
...(Litigation Guardian of) v. (Gagnon), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022, Amchem Products Inc. v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897, Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje, 2015 SCC 42, Kaynes v. BP, plc, 2014 ONCA 580, Kaynes v. BP, plc, 2016 ONCA 601, Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. v. Ll......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 26 ' April 30, 2021)
...(3d) 674 (CA), Heidari v. Naghshbandi, 2020 ONCA 757, Amchem Products Incorporated v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897, Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17, Forbes Energy Group Inc. v. Parsian Energy Rad Gas, 2019 ONCA 372, Young v. Tyco Internatio......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (February 19 – February 23)
...3 S.C.R. 1077, Tolofson v. Jensen, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022, Amchem Products Inc. v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897, Business Development Bank of Canada v. Cavalon Inc., 2017 ONCA 663, Boily v. Carleton Condominium Corporation 145, 2014 ONCA 574, Echostar Co......
-
Table of Cases
...Div.) .......................................... 501 Amchem Products Incorporated v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897, 102 D.L.R. (4th) 96, [1993] S.C.J. No. 34 ...................................................................... 552 American Express Int......
-
Litigating Conspiracy: An Introduction
...After many attempts to reverse this decision, several of the defendants brought applications in British Columbia seeking anti51 [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897 306 LITIGATING CONSPIRACY: AN ANALYSIS OF COMPETITION CLASS ACTIONS suit injunctions against the claimants in the Texas action. The British Col......
-
Table of cases
...B.C.L.R. (3d) 335, 24 C.P.C. (4th) 203 (S.C.).. 121, 126, 151 Amchem Products Inc. v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897 152 Amendt v. Canada Life Assurance Company, [1999] SJ. No. 157 (Q.B.) 648 American Cyanamid Co. v. Ethicon Ltd., [1975] A.C. 396, (1975)......
-
Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
...v Borschel, 2020 ONSC 4395 citing Amchem Products Incorporated v British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), 1993 CanLII 124 (SCC), [1993] 1 SCR 897. As to the application of the forum non conveniens doctrine to a divorce proceeding, see Bullecer v Mayangat, 2010 ABQB 680; Roco v Roco, ......