Table of cases

• Author: Robert G. Howell
• Profession: Professor. Faculty of Law University of Victoria British Columbia
• Pages: 319-336

319

TABLE OF CASES

1215757 Ontario Inc. (Saxon Chocolates) v. Zhadan (2003), 127

A.C.W.S. (3d) 78, [2003] O.J. No. 3068 (S.C.J.) .....................................160

1267623 Ontario Inc. v. Nexx Online Inc. (1999), 45 O.R. (3d) 40,

46 B.L.R. (2d) 317, [1999] O.J. No. 2246 (S.C.J.)............................ 170, 202

1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. WhenU.com, Inc., 309 F. Supp. 2d 467, 69

U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1337 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) .................................................174

1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. WhenU.com, Inc., 414 F.3d 400 (2d Cir. 2005) ......144

A & M Records, Inc., v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001) .........250

A.G. of Canada v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1982] 2 S.C.R.

307, 137 D.L.R. (3d) 1, [1982] S.C.J. No. 70 .............................................67

A.G. Spalding & Bros. v. A.W. Gamage Ltd., [1915] 32 R.P.C. 273,

31 T.L.R. 328 (H.L.) ...............................................................................135

AdVnt Biotechnologies, LLC v. Bohannon, 2007 U.S. Dist LEX IS

47160 (S. Ariz. 28 June 2007) ................................................................161

Alberta Gover nment Telephones v. Canada (Canadian Rad io-

Television and Telecommunications Commis sion), [1989]

2 S.C.R. 225, 61 D.L.R. (4th) 193, [1989] S.C.J. No. 84, aff’g

[1985] 2 F.C. 472, 15 D.L.R. (4th) 515, [1985] F.C.J. No. 50

(T.D.) ...........................................................................17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23

Amchem Products Inc. v. British Columbi a (Workers’ Compensation

Bureau), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897, 102 D.L.R. (4th) 96, [1993]

S.C.J. No. 34 .......................................................................................... 288

America Onl ine, Inc. v. IMS, 24 F. Supp. 2d 548 (E.D. Va. 1998) ................170

Annabel’s (Berkeley Squa re) Ltd. v. Schock, [1972] F.S.R. 261,

[1972] R.P.C. 838 (Eng. C.A.) ................................................................146

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW

320

Apple Computer, Inc. v. Mackintosh Computers Ltd., [1990] 2

S.C.R. 209, 30 C.P.R. 257, [1990] S.C.J. No. 61 ......................166, 239, 244

Armstrong v. Virgin Records, Ltd., 91 F. Supp. 2d 628, 2010 WL

2541367 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) ................................................................305, 308

Asbjorn Horgard A/S v. Gibbs/Nortac Industr ies Ltd., [1987] 3

F.C. 544, 14 C.P.R. 3d 314, [1987] F.C.J. No. 245 (C.A.) ........................132

Ashcroft, Attorney General v. American Civil Liberties Union,

322 F.3d 240 (3d Cir. 2003) ...................................................................21 3

Atkinson Footwa re v. Hodgskin Internat ional Ser vices (1994),

31 I.P.R. 186 (H.C.N.Z.) .........................................................................306

Attorney General (Quebec) v. Kellogg’s Co., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 211,

83 D.L.R. (3d) 314, [1978] S.C.J. No. 5............................. 26, 31, 32, 35, 45

Attorney General for Onta rio v. Winner, [1954] 2 W.L.R. 418,

[1954] 4 D.L.R. 657, [1954] 3 All E.R. 177 (P.C.) ............................... 17, 22

Attorney-General of New Ze aland v. Ortiz, [1984] A.C. 1 (H.L.) ................29 4

B.M.P. Global Distr ibution Inc. v. Bank of Nova Scotia, 2005

BCSC 1091, 8 B.L.R. (4th) 247, var’d (2007), 63 B.C.L.R.

(4th) 214, 2007 BCCA 52 .......................................................................189

Baigent v. Random House Group Ltd (2007), [2007] EWCA

Civ 247, [2008] E.M.L.R. 7, [2007] F.S.R. 24 (C.A.) ..............................220

Bangoura v. Washington Post (2004), 235 D.L.R. (4th) 564,

[2004] O.J. No. 284 (S.C.J.), rev’d (2005), 258 D.L.R. (4th)

341, [2005] O.J. No. 3849 (C.A.) ............................................ 286, 301, 302

Barrick Gold Cor p. v. Blanchard and Co., [2003] O.J. No. 5817,

9 B.L.R. (4th) 316 (S.C.J.) ..................................................................... 284

Baschet v. London Illustrated Sta ndard Company (1989), [1900]

1 Ch. 73, 69 L.J. Ch. 35 ..........................................................................309

Beals v. Saldanh a, 2003 SCC 72, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 416, 234 D.L.R.

(4th) 1.....................................................275, 283, 284, 290, 291, 292, 293,

294, 296, 297, 299, 307, 312, 313

Bell Canada v. Cope (Sarnia) Ltd. (1980), 11 C.C.L.T. 170, [1980]

O.J. No. 69 (H.C.), aff’d (1980), 31 O.R. (2d) 571, [1980] O.J.

No. 3882 (C.A.) ...................................................................................... 170

Bell Canada v. Quebec, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 749, 51 D.L.R. (4th) 161,

[1988] S.C.J. No. 41 ..................................................................................30

Bell Canada v. Unitel (1992), [1993] 1 F.C. 669, 99 D.L.R. (4th)

533, [1992] F.C.J. No. 1152 (C.A.) ..............................................................8

Bell Expres sVu v. R., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, 18 C.P.R. (4th) 289,

[2002] S.C.J. No. 43 ...................................................................... 57, 86, 87

Bishop v. Stevens, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 467, 31 C.P.R. (3d) 394, [1990]

S.C.J. No. 78 ...........................................................................218, 233, 235