Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mori Essex Nurseries Inc.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice H. Holmes |
| Citation | 2017 BCSC 203 |
| Date | 10 February 2017 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S145784 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Cleeves v. The Warden and Fellows of St. Antony’s College in the University of Oxford,
...in that it “would be fairer and more efficient” for disposing of the litigation: Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mori Essex Nurseries Inc., 2017 BCSC 203 at para. 30. In Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30 at para. 52 the Court ...This threshold......
-
Nordmark v. Frykman,
...was treated as binding in McIntyre v. Richardson Estate, 2012 BCSC 1347 at para. 58, and Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mori Essex Nurseries Inc., 2017 BCSC 203 at para. 20, 97 C.P.C. (7th) 271. In addition, I note that judges of the Supreme Court have referred to O’Brien (S.C.) as having been “uphe......
-
CHAPTER 6 Declining Jurisdiction
...held that a defendant who attorns cannot seek a stay of proceedings: O’Brien v Simard, 2006 BCSC 814; Andrew Peller Ltd v Mori Vines Inc, 2017 BCSC 203 at para 20. This view came under fire (see Blazek v Blazek, 2010 BCCA 188) before eventually being rejected (see Nordmark (Litigation guard......
-
2024 BCSC 391,
...to the jurisdiction of British Columbia, Flo is precluded from later arguing forum non conveniens: Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mon Vines Inc., 2017 BCSC 203 at paras. 35 Flo says they may, at the common issues trial, argue that foreign law applies, as set out in Part 3 of their response to civil ......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Cleeves v. The Warden and Fellows of St. Antony’s College in the University of Oxford,
...in that it “would be fairer and more efficient” for disposing of the litigation: Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mori Essex Nurseries Inc., 2017 BCSC 203 at para. 30. In Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, 2016 SCC 30 at para. 52 the Court ...This threshold......
-
Nordmark v. Frykman,
...was treated as binding in McIntyre v. Richardson Estate, 2012 BCSC 1347 at para. 58, and Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mori Essex Nurseries Inc., 2017 BCSC 203 at para. 20, 97 C.P.C. (7th) 271. In addition, I note that judges of the Supreme Court have referred to O’Brien (S.C.) as having been “uphe......
-
2024 BCSC 391,
...to the jurisdiction of British Columbia, Flo is precluded from later arguing forum non conveniens: Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mon Vines Inc., 2017 BCSC 203 at paras. 35 Flo says they may, at the common issues trial, argue that foreign law applies, as set out in Part 3 of their response to civil ......
-
Lam v Flo Health Inc.,
...to the jurisdiction of British Columbia, Flo is precluded from later arguing forum non conveniens: Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mon Vines Inc., 2017 BCSC 203 at paras. 35 Flo says they may, at the common issues trial, argue that foreign law applies, as set out in Part 3 of their response to civil ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
CHAPTER 6 Declining Jurisdiction
...held that a defendant who attorns cannot seek a stay of proceedings: O’Brien v Simard, 2006 BCSC 814; Andrew Peller Ltd v Mori Vines Inc, 2017 BCSC 203 at para 20. This view came under fire (see Blazek v Blazek, 2010 BCCA 188) before eventually being rejected (see Nordmark (Litigation guard......