Arbeau v Schulz, 2018 ABQB 941
| Judge | M.J. Lema |
| Citation | 2018 ABQB 941 |
| Docket Number | FL03 31274 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 16 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Kirkness v Emberley, 2019 ABQB 159
...J. held (at paras 45-49 and 63) that responding to a notice to disclose was a material advance (also under the predecessor rule). [13] 2018 ABQB 941 (paras. 100-109 andtice Verville did not order any disclosure to be provided … no disclosure was provided, and so going back to the case I ref......
-
Coble v Atkin,
...Materially responding to a Notice to Disclose in family litigation usually constitutes a significant advance: Arbeau v Schulz, 2018 ABQB 941 at para 96 [Arbeau QB], affirmed 2019 ABCA 204 [Arbeau CA]; Kapicki v Kapicki, 2010 ABQB 615 at paras 8-13; Repas v Repas, 2010 ABQB 569 at paras 37-4......
-
Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266
...was a result of defendant’s insistence to have their own applications prioritized. [at paras 32, 41-42] Defence delay Arbeau v Schulz, 2018 ABQB 941 Lema J Delay, total of 7 years, excused based on defendant’s delay in filing statement of defence, making disclosure, and provide responses to......
-
Trotter v Sawyer,
...value of a family property asset at separation and at trial is required to be determined for such actions: see Arbeau v Schulz, 2018 ABQB 941 at paras 52–60; Mustard v Brache, 2006 ABCA 265 at paras [16] As noted by Ms. Trotter’s couns......
4 cases
-
Kirkness v Emberley, 2019 ABQB 159
...J. held (at paras 45-49 and 63) that responding to a notice to disclose was a material advance (also under the predecessor rule). [13] 2018 ABQB 941 (paras. 100-109 andtice Verville did not order any disclosure to be provided … no disclosure was provided, and so going back to the case I ref......
-
Coble v Atkin,
...Materially responding to a Notice to Disclose in family litigation usually constitutes a significant advance: Arbeau v Schulz, 2018 ABQB 941 at para 96 [Arbeau QB], affirmed 2019 ABCA 204 [Arbeau CA]; Kapicki v Kapicki, 2010 ABQB 615 at paras 8-13; Repas v Repas, 2010 ABQB 569 at paras 37-4......
-
Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266
...was a result of defendant’s insistence to have their own applications prioritized. [at paras 32, 41-42] Defence delay Arbeau v Schulz, 2018 ABQB 941 Lema J Delay, total of 7 years, excused based on defendant’s delay in filing statement of defence, making disclosure, and provide responses to......
-
Trotter v Sawyer,
...value of a family property asset at separation and at trial is required to be determined for such actions: see Arbeau v Schulz, 2018 ABQB 941 at paras 52–60; Mustard v Brache, 2006 ABCA 265 at paras [16] As noted by Ms. Trotter’s couns......