Arce v. Simon Fraser Health Region et al.,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeSigurdson, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation2003 BCSC 998,[2003] B.C.T.C. 998 (SC)
Date26 June 2003

Arce v. Simon Fraser Health, [2003] B.C.T.C. 998 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2003] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JL.066

Achilles Asanza Arce, by his Guardian ad Litem, Arnold Arce (plaintiff) v. Simon Fraser Health Region, operating Public Hospitals under the names of Royal Columbian Hospital, Eagle Ridge Hospital and Burnaby General Hospital, and the said Royal Columbian Hospital, Eagle Ridge Hospital and Burnaby General Hospital, Dr. Andrew Lee, Dr. Raymond Muller, Dr. Paul Huang, Dr. John Doe, Dr. Richard Doe, Dr. Jane Doe, Nurse Jane Doe #1, Nurse Jane Doe #2 and Nurse Jane Doe #3 (defendants)

(S021268; 2003 BCSC 998)

Indexed As: Arce v. Simon Fraser Health Region et al.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Sigurdson, J.

June 26, 2003.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Damage Awards - Topic 187

Injury and death - Neck injuries - Spinal cord (incl. resulting in paralysis) - See paragraphs 258 to 264.

Damage Awards - Topic 489

Injury and death - General damage awards - Cost of future care and treatment - See paragraphs 46 to 257.

Evidence - Topic 1527

Hearsay rule - Hearsay rule exceptions and exclusions - General - Where admission of hearsay necessary and evidence reliable - See paragraphs 149 to 172.

Cases Noticed:

Andrews et al. v. Grand & Toy (Alberta) Ltd. et al., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 229; 19 N.R. 50; 8 A.R. 182; [1978] 1 W.W.R. 577; 83 D.L.R.(3d) 452; 3 C.C.L.T. 225, refd to. [para. 46].

Thornton v. Board of School Trustees of School District No. 57 (Prince George) et al., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 267; 19 N.R. 552; 83 D.L.R.(3d) 480; [1978] 1 W.W.R. 607; 3 C.C.L.T. 257, refd to. [para. 46].

Teno et al. v. Arnold et al., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 287; 19 N.R. 1; 83 D.L.R.(3d) 609; 3 C.C.L.T. 272, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53; 41 O.A.C. 353; 59 C.C.C.(3d) 92; 79 C.R.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 155].

R. v. Smith (A.L.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915; 139 N.R. 323; 55 O.A.C. 321; 75 C.C.C.(3d) 257; 94 D.L.R.(4th) 590; 15 C.R.(4th) 133, refd to. [para. 155].

R. v. Starr (R.D.), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144; 258 N.R. 250; 148 Man.R.(2d) 161; 224 W.A.C. 161; 147 C.C.C.(3d) 449, refd to. [para. 162].

Dennis v. Gairdner et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 1289; 5 B.C.L.R.(4th) 275 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 201].

Milina v. Bartsch (1985), 49 B.C.L.R.(2d) 33 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 210].

Bystedt v. Hay et al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 1735 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 211].

Brennan v. Singh et al. (1999), 6 B.C.T.C. 81 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 219].

Suveges v. Martens, [2000] B.C.T.C. 343 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 220].

Lusignan v. Concordia Hospital et al. (1997), 117 Man.R.(2d) 241 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 223].

Kraft v. Oshawa General Hospital, [1985] O.J. No. 1085 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 226].

Lindal v. Lindal, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 629; 39 N.R. 361; [1982] 1 W.W.R. 433; 129 D.L.R.(3d) 263; 34 B.C.L.R. 273; 19 C.C.L.T. 1, refd to. [para. 258].

Gogol v. Woolworth (F.W.) Co., [1996] B.C.J. No. 2047 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 263].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Klar, Remedies in Tort (2000 Looseleaf), p. 27-119-20 [para. 212].

Sopinka, John, Lederman, Sidney N., and Bryant, Alan W., The Law of Evidence in Canada (2nd Ed. 1999), para. 6.225 [para. 157].

Counsel:

J.E. Murphy, Q.C., and D. Holubitsky, for the plaintiff;

L.N. Bakan and D.J. Bell, for the defendant, Simon Fraser Health Region;

B.J. Norell and S.M. Forestell, for the defendant, Dr. Andrew Lee.

This case was heard on February 24-27 and March 3-5 and 11-14, 2003, before Sigurdson, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on June 26, 2003.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...309 Arce (Guardian ad litem of) v Simon Fraser Health Region (2003), 17 CCLT (3d) 97, [2003] BCJ No 1516, 2003 BCSC 998 .....................141, 197 Arnold v Cartwright Estate, 2007 BCSC 1602 ................................................... 243 Arnold v Teno, [1978] 2 SCR 287, 83 DLR (3......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Remedies: the Law of Damages. Second Edition Part Three
    • September 8, 2008
    ...274 Arce (Guardian ad litem of) v. Simon Fraser Health Region (2003), 17 C.C.L.T. (3d) 97, [2003] B.C.J. No. 1516, 2003 BCSC 998 ............. 124, 173 Arnold v. Teno, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 287, 83 D.L.R. (3d) 609, 3 C.C.L.T. 272 .......................................... 112, 120, 127, 146 –47, ......
  • Sidhu v. Hiebert,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 17, 2022
    ...and others in the field recognize his work as the “gold standard”: Arce (Guardian at Litem) v. Simon Fraser Health Region, 2003 BCSC 998 at paras. 182, 184-185. [644]    Dr. DeVivo concluded in his report, dated September 29, 2019, that the plaintiff’......
  • Latreille v. Downey,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 30, 2020
    ...not pessimistic based on the authorities: Dennis v. Gairdner (2002), 5 B.C.L.R. (4th) 275 (S.C.); Arce v. Simon Fraser Health Regions, 2003 BCSC 998. [300] In this case, the parties did not tender any evidence as to Mr. Latreille’s life expectancy. Taking an optimistic approach and absent e......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Sidhu v. Hiebert,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 17, 2022
    ...and others in the field recognize his work as the “gold standard”: Arce (Guardian at Litem) v. Simon Fraser Health Region, 2003 BCSC 998 at paras. 182, 184-185. [644]    Dr. DeVivo concluded in his report, dated September 29, 2019, that the plaintiff’......
  • Latreille v. Downey,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 30, 2020
    ...not pessimistic based on the authorities: Dennis v. Gairdner (2002), 5 B.C.L.R. (4th) 275 (S.C.); Arce v. Simon Fraser Health Regions, 2003 BCSC 998. [300] In this case, the parties did not tender any evidence as to Mr. Latreille’s life expectancy. Taking an optimistic approach and absent e......
  • Latreille v. Downey,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 30, 2020
    ...based on the authorities: Dennis v. Gairdner (2002), 5 B.C.L.R. (4th) 275 (S.C.); Arce v. Simon Fraser Health Regions, 2003 BCSC 998. [300]     In this case, the parties did not tender any evidence as to Mr. Latreille’s life expectancy. Taking an optimis......
  • Monych v. Beacon Community Services Society et al.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 28, 2009
    ...not pessimistic based on the authorities: Dennis v. Gairdner (2002) 5 B.C.L.R. (4th) 275 (S.C.); Arce v. Simon Fraser Health Regions , 2003 BCSC 998. [83] The defendants assert that much of what Ms. Petra recommends is not medically necessary. The defendants also assert that if all the reco......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Remedies: the Law of Damages. Second Edition Part Three
    • September 8, 2008
    ...274 Arce (Guardian ad litem of) v. Simon Fraser Health Region (2003), 17 C.C.L.T. (3d) 97, [2003] B.C.J. No. 1516, 2003 BCSC 998 ............. 124, 173 Arnold v. Teno, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 287, 83 D.L.R. (3d) 609, 3 C.C.L.T. 272 .......................................... 112, 120, 127, 146 –47, ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...309 Arce (Guardian ad litem of) v Simon Fraser Health Region (2003), 17 CCLT (3d) 97, [2003] BCJ No 1516, 2003 BCSC 998 .....................141, 197 Arnold v Cartwright Estate, 2007 BCSC 1602 ................................................... 243 Arnold v Teno, [1978] 2 SCR 287, 83 DLR (3......