Arctic Cat, Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., 2020 FCA 116
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FCA 116 |
| Date | 06 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Wasylynuk v. Canada (Royal Mounted Police), 2020 FC 962
...Agency), at para 19. [133] The RJR-MacDonald framework also applies to stays: Arctic Cat Inc. v Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., 2020 FCA 116 (Rivoalen JA), at para 10; Newbould v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 106, [2018] 1 FCR 590 (Pelletier JA), at paras 14 and 20; Toronto Rea......
-
Monsanto v. Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053
...JA), at paras 13-14. [49] The RJR-MacDonald framework also applies to stays: Arctic Cat Inc. v Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., 2020 FCA 116 (Rivoalen JA), at para 10; Newbould v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 106, [2018] 1 FCR 590 (Pelletier JA), at paras 14 and 20; Toronto Real......
-
Ledshumanan v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2021 FC 1463
...see also, e.g., Canada (Attorney General) v Robinson, 2021 FCA 39 at para 24; Arctic Cat, Inc v Bombardier Recreational Products Inc, 2020 FCA 116 at paras 19-20; Glooscap at para 31). I agree that this test does not mean certainty; but it clearly means more than simple likelihood. While th......
-
Bell Canada v. Beanfield Technologies Inc., 2024 FCA 28
...unavoidable irreparable harm will result unless a stay is granted”: see Arctic Cat, Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., 2020 FCA 116, 176 C.P.R. (4th) 323 at para. 20, citing Glooscap Heritage Society v. Canada (National Revenue), 2012 FCA 255, [2012] F.C.J. No. 1661 (QL) ......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Wasylynuk v. Canada (Royal Mounted Police), 2020 FC 962
...Agency), at para 19. [133] The RJR-MacDonald framework also applies to stays: Arctic Cat Inc. v Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., 2020 FCA 116 (Rivoalen JA), at para 10; Newbould v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 106, [2018] 1 FCR 590 (Pelletier JA), at paras 14 and 20; Toronto Rea......
-
Monsanto v. Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053
...JA), at paras 13-14. [49] The RJR-MacDonald framework also applies to stays: Arctic Cat Inc. v Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., 2020 FCA 116 (Rivoalen JA), at para 10; Newbould v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 106, [2018] 1 FCR 590 (Pelletier JA), at paras 14 and 20; Toronto Real......
-
Ledshumanan v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2021 FC 1463
...see also, e.g., Canada (Attorney General) v Robinson, 2021 FCA 39 at para 24; Arctic Cat, Inc v Bombardier Recreational Products Inc, 2020 FCA 116 at paras 19-20; Glooscap at para 31). I agree that this test does not mean certainty; but it clearly means more than simple likelihood. While th......
-
Bell Canada v. Beanfield Technologies Inc., 2024 FCA 28
...unavoidable irreparable harm will result unless a stay is granted”: see Arctic Cat, Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., 2020 FCA 116, 176 C.P.R. (4th) 323 at para. 20, citing Glooscap Heritage Society v. Canada (National Revenue), 2012 FCA 255, [2012] F.C.J. No. 1661 (QL) ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
IP Litigation 2020 Year In Review
...Technologies Inc. v. Human Care Canada Inc., 2019 FCA 11 (Justice Webb). 71. Arctic Cat, Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., 2020 FCA 116 (Justice 72. Arctic Cat, Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., 2020 FCA 116 at para. 32 (Justice Rivoalen). 73. Fluid Energy Group Lt......