Ash (H.) & Associates Ltd. v. Banham, 2014 ABQB 718

CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterEVIDENCE,CONTRACTS,PRACTICE,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
Date24 November 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Mitchell v Pytel,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 21 Mayo 2021
    ...lien arising on demand for payment – assuming that the action was warranted. See H Ash & Associates Ltd v Banham, 2014 ABQB 718, Mason M at para 56; Leacock v Leacock at paras 20, 24, [295]     Mr. Mitchell knew that Mr. Pytel had not paid the purchase price f......
  • Riccioni v Law Society of Alberta (The),, 2017 ABQB 261
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 12 Abril 2017
    ...the summary judgment application: Hur v 726913 Alberta Ltd, 2013 ABQB 208 (CanLII) at para. 27 and H. Ash & Associates v Banham, 2014 ABQB 718, [2014] A.R. 731. In my view, the same applies to an application to strike a claim under rule 3.68. It is not a simple matter to perform this an......
  • Callan v Lorrnel Consulting Group Ltd, 2017 ABQB 158
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Marzo 2017
    ...Lorrnel and the Respondent, should result in dismissal of an application for summary judgment: H. Ash & Associates Ltd. v. Banham, 2014 ABQB 718, para. The Law on Summary Dismissal Summary judgment/summary dismissal assists in fulfilling the foundational rules of out Rules of Court, and......
3 cases
  • Mitchell v Pytel,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 21 Mayo 2021
    ...lien arising on demand for payment – assuming that the action was warranted. See H Ash & Associates Ltd v Banham, 2014 ABQB 718, Mason M at para 56; Leacock v Leacock at paras 20, 24, [295]     Mr. Mitchell knew that Mr. Pytel had not paid the purchase price f......
  • Riccioni v Law Society of Alberta (The),, 2017 ABQB 261
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 12 Abril 2017
    ...the summary judgment application: Hur v 726913 Alberta Ltd, 2013 ABQB 208 (CanLII) at para. 27 and H. Ash & Associates v Banham, 2014 ABQB 718, [2014] A.R. 731. In my view, the same applies to an application to strike a claim under rule 3.68. It is not a simple matter to perform this an......
  • Callan v Lorrnel Consulting Group Ltd, 2017 ABQB 158
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Marzo 2017
    ...Lorrnel and the Respondent, should result in dismissal of an application for summary judgment: H. Ash & Associates Ltd. v. Banham, 2014 ABQB 718, para. The Law on Summary Dismissal Summary judgment/summary dismissal assists in fulfilling the foundational rules of out Rules of Court, and......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT