AstraZeneca AB et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al.,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 454,2009 FC 822,[2009] F.T.R. Uned. 454 (FC) |
| Date | 11 August 2009 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...[1990] A.J. No. 340 (C.A.) ............................................................................. 19 Astrazeneca AB v. Apotex Inc., 2009 FC 822................................................. 14– 15 Atkinson v. McGregor (1998), 66 Alta. L.R. (3d) 289, 227 A.R. 376, [1998] A.J. No. 8......
-
Table of cases
...[1990] AJ No 340 (CA) .................................................................................. 25 Astrazeneca AB v Apotex Inc, 2009 FC 822 ..........................................................17 Atkinson v McGregor (1998), 66 Alta LR (3d) 289, 227 AR 376, [1998] AJ No 838 (QB......
-
Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
...Inc v Buschau , 2012 FCA 100 at para 31 (charges allowed but reduced due to lack of receipts); Astrazeneca AB v Apotex Inc , 2009 FC 822 (LexisNexis Quicklaw charges allowed but reduced); Simpson Strong-Tie Co v Peak Innovations Inc , 2009 FCA 202 (charges allowed since searches attributed ......
-
Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
...searches allowed, online research is generally cost-effective]; Xidos , above note 6 at paras. 15–17. 20 AstraZeneca AB v. Apotex Inc. , 2009 FC 822 [Quicklaw charges allowed but Introduction to Legal Research and Writing 15 party was successful in passing on all or part of its costs of con......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Janssen-Ortho Inc. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., (2012) 428 N.R. 318 (FCA)
...et al., [2008] F.T.R. Uned. 985; 2008 FC 988, refd to. [para. 6]. AstraZeneca AB et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 454; 2009 FC 822, refd to. [para. Janssen Inc. et al. v. Teva Canada Ltd., [2012] F.T.R. Uned. 27; 2012 FC 48, appld. [para. 6]. Minde v. Ermineskin Cree Nation......
-
Truehope Nutritional Support Ltd. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.,
...FC 51, at paragraphs 32 to 37, Janssen Inc v Teva Canada Limited , 2012 FC 48, at paragraphs 44 and 45, and AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Inc , 2009 FC 822 at paragraph 38. Then, on page 11 of the Applicants' Memorandum, counsel outlines that for the cross-examinations of Dr. Kapan, Dr. Popper, M......
-
Janssen Inc. et al. v. Teva Canada Ltd.,
...Inc v. Apotex Inc , 2008 FC 988, Mercury Launch & Tug LTD v. Texada Quarrying Ltd , 2009 FC 331, Astra Zeneca AB v. Apotex Inc , 2009 FC 822). However, in none of these cases was I able to find an indication that counsel presented evidence of a "preparation room" having been set up to f......
-
Georgetown Rail Equipment Company v. Tetra Tech Eba Inc.,
...in relation to a trial or hearing “encompasses fees related to costs submissions,” and cited AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Inc, 2009 FC 822 [AstraZeneca], at paragraph 40, wherein similar costs were allowed by an Assessment Officer. It was also submitted that the Defendant’s ......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...[1990] A.J. No. 340 (C.A.) ............................................................................. 19 Astrazeneca AB v. Apotex Inc., 2009 FC 822................................................. 14– 15 Atkinson v. McGregor (1998), 66 Alta. L.R. (3d) 289, 227 A.R. 376, [1998] A.J. No. 8......
-
Table of cases
...[1990] AJ No 340 (CA) .................................................................................. 25 Astrazeneca AB v Apotex Inc, 2009 FC 822 ..........................................................17 Atkinson v McGregor (1998), 66 Alta LR (3d) 289, 227 AR 376, [1998] AJ No 838 (QB......
-
Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
...Inc v Buschau , 2012 FCA 100 at para 31 (charges allowed but reduced due to lack of receipts); Astrazeneca AB v Apotex Inc , 2009 FC 822 (LexisNexis Quicklaw charges allowed but reduced); Simpson Strong-Tie Co v Peak Innovations Inc , 2009 FCA 202 (charges allowed since searches attributed ......
-
Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
...searches allowed, online research is generally cost-effective]; Xidos , above note 6 at paras. 15–17. 20 AstraZeneca AB v. Apotex Inc. , 2009 FC 822 [Quicklaw charges allowed but Introduction to Legal Research and Writing 15 party was successful in passing on all or part of its costs of con......