Aubin v. Quantiam Technologies Inc., 2018 ABCA 440

CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
JudgeWakeling
Citation2018 ABCA 440
Docket Number1803-0331-AC
Date21 December 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • July 23, 2020
    ...negatively impacted its solicitor’s lien. It cites the following cases in support of its position: Aubin v Quantiam Technologies Inc., 2018 ABCA 440 [Aubin]; Campbell-West Ltd. v Kristian Equipment Ltd. (1989), 74 Sask R 75 (CA) [Campbell-West]; R v Homestake Mining Company (1977), 76 DLR (......
  • Petrone v Aubin
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 21, 2022
    ...or disposing of/charging the building until documentation complete. Aubin awarded costs of $369,000.   Aubin v Quantiam, 2018 ABCA 440:  Aubin sought to strike Quantiam’s appeal and Quantiam sought and received leave to  Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 Appeal Jan, 2020......
  • Condominium Corporation No 022 5899 v 499430 Alberta Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 28, 2019
    ...its directorship was susceptible to termination, or at least interruption, if 383 were struck from time to time. [2] 2015 ABCA 366 [3] 2018 ABCA 440 [4] SA 2007, c U-1.5, paras 1(oo) (definition of “vested land” – land that has vested in the Crown in accordance with section 15) and 1(qq) (d......
4 cases
  • Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • July 23, 2020
    ...negatively impacted its solicitor’s lien. It cites the following cases in support of its position: Aubin v Quantiam Technologies Inc., 2018 ABCA 440 [Aubin]; Campbell-West Ltd. v Kristian Equipment Ltd. (1989), 74 Sask R 75 (CA) [Campbell-West]; R v Homestake Mining Company (1977), 76 DLR (......
  • Barker v. Federation of Newfoundland Indians Inc.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Newfoundland)
    • August 30, 2024
    ...of Parents, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 549; Re: Office of the Public Trustee; Brake v. Brake, 2019 NLCA 68; Aubin v. Quantiam Technologies Inc., 2018 ABCA 440; Condominium Corporation No 022 5899 v. 499430 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ABQB STATUTES CONSIDERED: Indian Act, RSC 1985, c. I-5. MEMORANDUM OF DISPOSI......
  • Petrone v Aubin
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 21, 2022
    ...or disposing of/charging the building until documentation complete. Aubin awarded costs of $369,000.   Aubin v Quantiam, 2018 ABCA 440:  Aubin sought to strike Quantiam’s appeal and Quantiam sought and received leave to  Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 Appeal Jan, 2020......
  • Condominium Corporation No 022 5899 v 499430 Alberta Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 28, 2019
    ...its directorship was susceptible to termination, or at least interruption, if 383 were struck from time to time. [2] 2015 ABCA 366 [3] 2018 ABCA 440 [4] SA 2007, c U-1.5, paras 1(oo) (definition of “vested land” – land that has vested in the Crown in accordance with section 15) and 1(qq) (d......