Bales Beall LLP v. Fingrut

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeLauwers, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Citation[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 4991,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 4991 (SC),2012 ONSC 4991
Date10 October 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Malton v. Attia, (2013) 573 A.R. 200 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 6 Mayo 2013
    ...Uned. 28 ; 2013 ONCA 23 , dist. [para. 82, footnote 37]. Bales Beall LLP v. Fingrut, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 4991 ; 356 D.L.R.(4th) 103 ; 2012 ONSC 4991, refd to. [para. 85, footnote 38]. Bales Beall LLP v. Fingrut, [2013] O.A.C. Uned. 211 ; 2013 ONCA 266 , refd to. [para. 87, footnote 39]......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Research and Writing. Fourth Edition
    • 23 Junio 2016
    ...[1999] 2 SCR 817 ......................................................................................... 178 Bales Beall LLP v Fingrut, 2012 ONSC 4991 ....................................................... 13 Banihashem-Bakhtiari v Axes Investments Inc (2003), 66 OR (3d) 284, [2003] OTC ......
  • Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Research and Writing. Fourth Edition
    • 23 Junio 2016
    ...Farris, Vaughan, Wills & Murphy LLP v Moses , 2013 BCSC 1295 at para 101 (charges allowed, no discussion); Bales Beall LLP v Fingrut , 2012 ONSC 4991 at para 72 (incorrect for assessment officer to reduce online charges by 50 percent on the mistaken belief that “this research is a learning ......
  • Gayle v Cambridge Mercantile Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 16 Abril 2024
    ...expert evidence is generally required to establish a claim of deficient or incompetent assistance by counsel: Bales Beall LLP v. Fingrut, 2012 ONSC 4991 at paras 34-35, affirmed 2013 ONCA 266 at para 91 The Plaintiffs could not argue that further evidence may be forthcoming to justify proce......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • Malton v. Attia, (2013) 573 A.R. 200 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 6 Mayo 2013
    ...Uned. 28 ; 2013 ONCA 23 , dist. [para. 82, footnote 37]. Bales Beall LLP v. Fingrut, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 4991 ; 356 D.L.R.(4th) 103 ; 2012 ONSC 4991, refd to. [para. 85, footnote 38]. Bales Beall LLP v. Fingrut, [2013] O.A.C. Uned. 211 ; 2013 ONCA 266 , refd to. [para. 87, footnote 39]......
  • Gayle v Cambridge Mercantile Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 16 Abril 2024
    ...expert evidence is generally required to establish a claim of deficient or incompetent assistance by counsel: Bales Beall LLP v. Fingrut, 2012 ONSC 4991 at paras 34-35, affirmed 2013 ONCA 266 at para 91 The Plaintiffs could not argue that further evidence may be forthcoming to justify proce......
  • Evans Sweeny Bordin LLP v. Zawadzki et al., (2015) 342 O.A.C. 160 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 20 Octubre 2015
    ...162 O.A.C. 85; 60 O.R.(3d) 257 (C.A.), dist. [para. 19]. Bales Beall LLP v. Fingrut, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 4991; 356 D.L.R.(4th) 103; 2012 ONSC 4991, refd to. [para. Rabbani v. Niagara (Regional Municipality), [2012] O.A.C. Uned. 242; 2 M.P.L.R.(5th) 23; 2012 ONCA 280, refd to. [para. 32]. Co......
  • Reiss v. Torys LLP,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 4 Octubre 2018
    ...and the evidence related to them, showing the path of reasoning:  Bales and Beall LLP v. Fingrut, 2013 ONCA 266, aff’g, 2012 ONSC 4991; Wilson, at para. 90.  [34]        Based on the foregoing, I see no basis for interfering with the Certi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (December 2015)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 17 Diciembre 2015
    ..."may confirm the report in whole or in part or make such other order as is just." Moreover, pursuant to Bales Beall LLP v. Fingrut, 2012 ONSC 4991, if a judge hearing a motion to oppose finds that an assessment officer committed an error in principle, the judge may either correct the error ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Research and Writing. Fourth Edition
    • 23 Junio 2016
    ...[1999] 2 SCR 817 ......................................................................................... 178 Bales Beall LLP v Fingrut, 2012 ONSC 4991 ....................................................... 13 Banihashem-Bakhtiari v Axes Investments Inc (2003), 66 OR (3d) 284, [2003] OTC ......
  • Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Research and Writing. Fourth Edition
    • 23 Junio 2016
    ...Farris, Vaughan, Wills & Murphy LLP v Moses , 2013 BCSC 1295 at para 101 (charges allowed, no discussion); Bales Beall LLP v Fingrut , 2012 ONSC 4991 at para 72 (incorrect for assessment officer to reduce online charges by 50 percent on the mistaken belief that “this research is a learning ......