Bent v. Platnick
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas |
| Citation | 2020 SCC 23 |
| Docket Number | 38374 |
| Date | 10 September 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
322 practice notes
-
Levant v. Stirling
...11, aff’g 2017 ONSC 5956 , leave to appeal refused [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 194. [13] Platnick v. Bent, 2018 ONCA 687 at para. 38, aff’d 2020 SCC 23; 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Assn., 2018 ONCA 685 at paras. 55–65, aff’d 2020 SCC [14] Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. West Fac......
-
Soliman v. Bordman
...33. [30] Canadian Union of Postal Workers v. B'nai Brith Canada, 2021 ONCA 529 at para. 23 aff’g 2020 ONSC 323 ; Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23 at para. [31] Walsh Energy Inc. (c.o.b. The Energy Centre) v. Better Business Bureau of Ottawa-Hull Inc. (c.o.b. Better Business Bureau Serving E......
-
Hansman v. Neufeld
...of s. 137.1 in 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association, 2020 SCC 22 , [2020] 2 S.C.R. 587 , and Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23, [2020] 2 S.C.R. 645 , applies with equal force to s. 4 of the Under s. 4(2)(b) of the PPPA, on one side of the public interest weighing exercise, ......
-
Barendregt v. Grebliunas
...7 R.F.L. (5th) 425; Sengmueller v. Sengmueller (1994), 17 O.R. (3d) 208; R. v. Owen, 2003 SCC 33, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 779; Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23; Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014; Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813; Children’s Aid Society of Halton (Region) v. A......
Get Started for Free
228 cases
-
Levant v. Stirling
...11, aff’g 2017 ONSC 5956 , leave to appeal refused [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 194. [13] Platnick v. Bent, 2018 ONCA 687 at para. 38, aff’d 2020 SCC 23; 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Assn., 2018 ONCA 685 at paras. 55–65, aff’d 2020 SCC [14] Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. West Fac......
-
Soliman v. Bordman
...33. [30] Canadian Union of Postal Workers v. B'nai Brith Canada, 2021 ONCA 529 at para. 23 aff’g 2020 ONSC 323 ; Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23 at para. [31] Walsh Energy Inc. (c.o.b. The Energy Centre) v. Better Business Bureau of Ottawa-Hull Inc. (c.o.b. Better Business Bureau Serving E......
-
Hansman v. Neufeld
...of s. 137.1 in 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association, 2020 SCC 22 , [2020] 2 S.C.R. 587 , and Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23, [2020] 2 S.C.R. 645 , applies with equal force to s. 4 of the Under s. 4(2)(b) of the PPPA, on one side of the public interest weighing exercise, ......
-
Barendregt v. Grebliunas
...7 R.F.L. (5th) 425; Sengmueller v. Sengmueller (1994), 17 O.R. (3d) 208; R. v. Owen, 2003 SCC 33, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 779; Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23; Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014; Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813; Children’s Aid Society of Halton (Region) v. A......
Get Started for Free
63 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 8 ' March 12, 2021)
...2010 ONSC 3860, Sullivan v. Draper-Sereda, [2006] O.J. No. 4671, Korach v. Moore (1991), 1 O.R. (3d) 275 (C.A.), Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23, Brad-Jay Investments Limited v. Village Developments Limited (2006), 218 O.A.C. 315 (C.A.), Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC 9, Fong v......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 24-28, 2022)
...Anti-SLAPP, Costs, Courts of Justice Act, ss. 131 and 137.1, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 1.03, 57.01 and 57.01(3), Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23, Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, 704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association, 2020 SCC 22, Barrick Gold Corp. v. Lopehandia (20......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 27, 2023 ' March 3, 2023)
...Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43("CJA"), 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association, 2020 SCC 22, Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23, Tamming v. Paterson, 2021 ONSC 8306, Canadian Thermo Windows Inc. v. Seangio, 2021 ONSC 6555, Canadian Union of Postal Workers v. B'nai Bri......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JANUARY 18 – 22, 2021)
...of Justice Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 137.1, 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association, 2020 SCC 22 , Bent v. Platnick, 2020 SCC 23, 1688782 Ontario Inc. v. Maple Leaf Foods Inc., 2020 SCC 35 , Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63 , Bella v. Young,......
Get Started for Free
31 books & journal articles
-
Matters Related to the Public Interest - Section 137.1(3)
...Medical Reports Filed on Behalf of Insurers in Arbitration Process Platnick v Bent , 2018 ONCA 687 at paras 34–41 Bent v Platnick , 2020 SCC 23 at para 83 Environmental Considerations Environmental Impact of a Proposed Subdivision 1704604 Ontario Ltd v Pointes Protection Association e......
-
Table of Cases
...96 Benson , R v , 2015 ONCA 827 ............................................................ 243 Bent v Platnick , 2020 SCC 23 ............................................................. 32 Berkson , R v , 2015 BCCA 224 ........................................................... 132 Berna......
-
The Defence of Qualified Privilege
...the full reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the defence of qualiied privilege are reproduced below. Bent v Platnick , 2020 SCC 23 per Côté J for the majority at paras 121–33 and 135–36: [121] An occasion of qualiied privilege exists if a person making a communication has “an i......
-
Table of Cases
...Montour, et al, 2019 CanLII 94477 (SCC) ......................133, 249, 284, 473 See also Montour v Beacon Publishing Inc Bent v Platnick, 2020 SCC 23 .............................. 19, 77–78, 88, 106, 118, 120, 125, 133, 144, 151, 159, 161–62, 167, 188, 192, 196, 221, 227, 232–35, 236, 237......
Get Started for Free
