Biehl v. Strang

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeArnold-Bailey, J.
Citation2011 BCSC 1373,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1373,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1373 (SC)
Date13 October 2011
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE,TRUSTS,PRACTICE

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
15 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...& Power Authority, [1993] 1 SCR 12, 99 DLR (4th) 577, 14 CCLT (2d) 233 .....................60, 61, 66, 69, 72, 368, 418 Biehl v Strang, 2011 BCSC 1373 ................................................................. 304, 305 Bingley v Morrison Fuels, a Division of 503373 Ontario Ltd, 2009......
  • Awards Measured by Benefit: Restitution
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Non-compensatory Damages
    • June 21, 2014
    ...at paras 221–23, var’d on other grounds 2010 BCCA 356 at para 16; Wilson , above note 17; S(DP) v L(BH) , 2011 BCSC 327; Biehl v Strang , 2011 BCSC 1373 at para 342 [ Biehl ]. Awards Measured by Benefit: Restitution 305 Lac Minerals Ltd v Int’l Corona Resources Ltd , 115 the Supreme Court o......
  • THE TROUBLE WITH WIGMORE: A NEW APPROACH TO IMPLIED WAIVER OF SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 52 No. 1, January 2019
    • January 1, 2019
    ...the Court made it clear that its decision was based on a finding of implied waiver. See ibid at paras 69, 74. (109) Biehl V Strang, 2011 BCSC 1373 at paras 16-17 [Biehl v Strang No (110) Biehl, supra note 22 at para 22; Biehl v Strang No 2, ibid at para 18. (111) Biehl, supra note 22 at par......
  • McDermott v. McDermott
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 21, 2013
    ...effect": Mathews v. Mathews , 2007 BCSC 1825 at para. 43. See also: R. v. G.J. , [2012] O.J. No. 4462 (S.C.J.); Biehl v. Strang , 2011 BCSC 1373; S.C. v. J.C. , 2009 SKQB 87; Rawlek v. Rawlek , [2003] B.C.J. No. 2231 (S.C.); B. (A.D.) v. B. (E.) , [1997] B.C.J. No. 227 (S.C.); Sweeton v. Sw......
  • Get Started for Free
13 cases
  • McDermott v. McDermott
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 21, 2013
    ...effect": Mathews v. Mathews , 2007 BCSC 1825 at para. 43. See also: R. v. G.J. , [2012] O.J. No. 4462 (S.C.J.); Biehl v. Strang , 2011 BCSC 1373; S.C. v. J.C. , 2009 SKQB 87; Rawlek v. Rawlek , [2003] B.C.J. No. 2231 (S.C.); B. (A.D.) v. B. (E.) , [1997] B.C.J. No. 227 (S.C.); Sweeton v. Sw......
  • Burton v Marwest Utilities Services Ltd
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 3, 2019
    ...excerpts from one legal text — George B. Klippert, , Butterworth & Co. (Canada) Ltd., 1983 and two case authorities: Biehl v. Strang, 2011 BCSC 1373 and Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC [260] The doctrine against unjust enrichment is intended to allow courts to “identify circumstances where ju......
  • Jacobs et al. v. Yehia et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 12, 2014
    ...and duties. Like other contracts, it may be evidenced orally, in writing, by conduct or by a combination thereof: Biehl v. Strang , 2011 BCSC 1373, paras. 326-330; Le Soleil , para. 323. [254] The essential elements of a loan were discussed by Satanove J. in Lee v. 1137434 Alberta Ltd. , 20......
  • Zhang v. Zhang
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 9, 2022
    ...the conversations were being recorded, the plaintiffs had the advantage of steering the conversations as they liked: Biehl v. Strang, 2011 BCSC 1373 at paras 68–70; A.M.E.R. v. P.J.R., 2003 BCSC 1466 at para. 16; M.Y.T.C. v. L.H.N., 2019 BCSC 2454 at para. 17; Lam v. Chiu, 2012 BCSC ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...& Power Authority, [1993] 1 SCR 12, 99 DLR (4th) 577, 14 CCLT (2d) 233 .....................60, 61, 66, 69, 72, 368, 418 Biehl v Strang, 2011 BCSC 1373 ................................................................. 304, 305 Bingley v Morrison Fuels, a Division of 503373 Ontario Ltd, 2009......
  • Awards Measured by Benefit: Restitution
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Non-compensatory Damages
    • June 21, 2014
    ...at paras 221–23, var’d on other grounds 2010 BCCA 356 at para 16; Wilson , above note 17; S(DP) v L(BH) , 2011 BCSC 327; Biehl v Strang , 2011 BCSC 1373 at para 342 [ Biehl ]. Awards Measured by Benefit: Restitution 305 Lac Minerals Ltd v Int’l Corona Resources Ltd , 115 the Supreme Court o......
  • THE TROUBLE WITH WIGMORE: A NEW APPROACH TO IMPLIED WAIVER OF SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 52 No. 1, January 2019
    • January 1, 2019
    ...the Court made it clear that its decision was based on a finding of implied waiver. See ibid at paras 69, 74. (109) Biehl V Strang, 2011 BCSC 1373 at paras 16-17 [Biehl v Strang No (110) Biehl, supra note 22 at para 22; Biehl v Strang No 2, ibid at para 18. (111) Biehl, supra note 22 at par......