Bobel v. Humecka and Patten, 2019 ONSC 1876
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Fowler Byrne |
| Citation | 2019 ONSC 1876 |
| Docket Number | CV-17-4031-00 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 22 March 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Bobel v. Humecka, Patten,
...It was the subject of a motion to strike the pleadings brought by the Defendants and heard by Fowler Byrne J. Her reasons, set out at 2019 ONSC 1876, struck a number of allegations either with (or without) leave to [116] Based on that decision, and on the submissions of the parties at the o......
-
Cerieco Canada Corp. v. Mizrahi,
...of the parties'". Salasel v. Cuthbertson, 2015 ONCA 115, 124 OR (3d) 401 at para. 9. See Bobel v. Humecka and Patten, 2019 ONSC 1876, at para. 18. All of this informs the key issue of whether the pleading "lacks ... legal merit" or "would put the administratio......
-
Thelwell v. Elaschuk et al, 2020 ONSC 340
...at para. 86.) [60] A helpful summary of the “scandalous, frivolous or vexatious” standard is set out in Bobel v. Humelka and Patten, 2019 ONSC 1876, at para. [18] The courts have tackled the definition of “scandalous”, “vexatious”, “frivolous” and what constitutes an “abuse of process” on m......
3 cases
-
Bobel v. Humecka, Patten,
...It was the subject of a motion to strike the pleadings brought by the Defendants and heard by Fowler Byrne J. Her reasons, set out at 2019 ONSC 1876, struck a number of allegations either with (or without) leave to [116] Based on that decision, and on the submissions of the parties at the o......
-
Cerieco Canada Corp. v. Mizrahi,
...of the parties'". Salasel v. Cuthbertson, 2015 ONCA 115, 124 OR (3d) 401 at para. 9. See Bobel v. Humecka and Patten, 2019 ONSC 1876, at para. 18. All of this informs the key issue of whether the pleading "lacks ... legal merit" or "would put the administratio......
-
Thelwell v. Elaschuk et al, 2020 ONSC 340
...at para. 86.) [60] A helpful summary of the “scandalous, frivolous or vexatious” standard is set out in Bobel v. Humelka and Patten, 2019 ONSC 1876, at para. [18] The courts have tackled the definition of “scandalous”, “vexatious”, “frivolous” and what constitutes an “abuse of process” on m......