Bombardier Inc. v. AS Estonian Air et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 3039
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Morgan, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | INTERNATIONAL LAW,CONFLICT OF LAWS,PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 3039,2013 ONSC 3039,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 3039 (SC) |
| Date | 24 May 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Privity of Contract
...at para 109. For a suggestion that the holding in Brown rests on the plaintiffs’ successor status, see Bombardier Inc v Estonia Air , 2013 ONSC 3039, aff’d 2014 ONCA 41 107 Kitimat (District) v Alcan Inc , 2006 BCCA 75 (municipality seeks to enforce agreement between province and local indu......
-
Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013
...reliance by the claimant. [194] The defendants also refer to the decision of this court in Bombardier Inc. v. AS Estonian Air, 2013 ONSC 3039, affirmed on appeal at 2014 ONCA 41. In its factum, OLG states that, as a general rule, the exception to privity of contract “can only be used as a s......
1 cases
-
Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013
...reliance by the claimant. [194] The defendants also refer to the decision of this court in Bombardier Inc. v. AS Estonian Air, 2013 ONSC 3039, affirmed on appeal at 2014 ONCA 41. In its factum, OLG states that, as a general rule, the exception to privity of contract “can only be used as a s......
1 books & journal articles
-
Privity of Contract
...at para 109. For a suggestion that the holding in Brown rests on the plaintiffs’ successor status, see Bombardier Inc v Estonia Air , 2013 ONSC 3039, aff’d 2014 ONCA 41 107 Kitimat (District) v Alcan Inc , 2006 BCCA 75 (municipality seeks to enforce agreement between province and local indu......