British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Alberta (Attorney General)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
Date24 September 2019
Citation2019 FC 1195
CourtFederal Court (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
24 practice notes
  • Litigating Cross-Border Aboriginal Title Claims in Canada: The Possibility (and Necessity) of a Federal Legislative Response to Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v. Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani-Utenam).
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 67 No. 2, December 2021
    • December 1, 2021
    ...of Exchequer, for the Dominion of Canada, SC 1875, c 11, s 54. See also British Columbia (Attorney General) v Alberta (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1195 at paras 32-49; Fyfe, supra note 41 at 332, n (282) Alberta v Canada, supra note 281 at para 30. (283) Hogg, Monahan & Wright, supra not......
  • Wasylynuk v. Canada (Royal Mounted Police)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2020
    ...harm and the balance of (in)convenience: see RJR-MacDonald, at p. 339; Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Alberta, 2019 FC 1195 (Grammond, J), at paras 97 and 173-179; Livent Inc. v Deloitte & Touche, 2016 ONCA 395 (Strathy CJO), at para 5; Unilin Beheer B.V., at......
  • Monsanto v. Canada (Health)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2020
    ...harm and the balance of (in)convenience: see RJR-MacDonald, at p. 339; Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Alberta, 2019 FC 1195 (Grammond, J), at paras 97 and 173-179; Toronto (City) v A.G. Ontario, 2018 ONCA 761, at para 10; Livent Inc. v Deloitte & Touche, 2016......
  • Alberta (Attorney General) v. British Columbia (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 26, 2021
    ...September 24, 2019, Grammond J. (the Judge) dismissed Alberta’s motion to strike and granted BC’s motion for an interlocutory injunction (2019 FC 1195). [11] On October 4, 2019, Alberta filed an appeal of the Judge’s decision asking this Court to set aside the Judge’s decision and to dismis......
  • Get Started for Free
12 cases
  • Wasylynuk v. Canada (Royal Mounted Police)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2020
    ...harm and the balance of (in)convenience: see RJR-MacDonald, at p. 339; Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Alberta, 2019 FC 1195 (Grammond, J), at paras 97 and 173-179; Livent Inc. v Deloitte & Touche, 2016 ONCA 395 (Strathy CJO), at para 5; Unilin Beheer B.V., at......
  • Monsanto v. Canada (Health)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2020
    ...harm and the balance of (in)convenience: see RJR-MacDonald, at p. 339; Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Alberta, 2019 FC 1195 (Grammond, J), at paras 97 and 173-179; Toronto (City) v A.G. Ontario, 2018 ONCA 761, at para 10; Livent Inc. v Deloitte & Touche, 2016......
  • Alberta (Attorney General) v. British Columbia (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 26, 2021
    ...2019, Grammond J. (the Judge) dismissed Alberta’s motion to strike and granted BC’s motion for an interlocutory injunction (2019 FC 1195). [11] On October 4, 2019, Alberta filed an appeal of the Judge’s decision asking this Court to set aside the Judge’s decision......
  • The Jewish Community Council of Montreal v. Canada (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 24, 2024
    ...v Canada (Royal Mounted Police), 2020 FC 962 at para 135 [Wasylynuk]; British Columbia (Attorney General) v Alberta (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1195 at para 97, rev’d on other grounds 2021 FCA 84; Indigenous Police Chiefs of Ontario v Canada (Public Safety), 2023 FC 916 at para 71 [Indigeno......
  • Get Started for Free
6 firm's commentaries
  • Legislature Passes Alberta Sovereignty Within A United Canada Act: Overview And Implications
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 13, 2022
    ...British Columbia (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 84 at para 188, reversing British Columbia (Attorney General) v Alberta (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1195. We note that this limitation may be less present if a constitutional reference case is launched by Alberta or Canada, where the more string......
  • 2019 In Review: Top Judicial Decisions And Trends In Canada's Energy Industry
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 30, 2020
    ...of Appeal decision, see here. British Columbia (Attorney General) v Alberta (Attorney General), 2019 ABQB 121 & 2019 ABQB 550 & 2019 FC 1195 In May 2018, the Alberta legislature passed the Preserving Canada's Economic Prosperity Act, colloquially known as its "Turn off the Taps" leg......
  • Federalism In The Patch: Canada's Energy Industry And Constitutional Division Of Powers
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 17, 2020
    ...v Alberta QB]. This case was ultimately continued in the Federal Court: British Columbia (Attorney General) v Alberta (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1195 [BC v Alberta Previously published in the Alberta Law Review The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subje......
  • Federal Court Of Appeal Lifts Injunction On Alberta's "Turn Off The Taps" Legislation
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 19, 2021
    ...Minister of Energy of Alberta from exercising powers under the Act. In British Columbia (Attorney General) v Alberta (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1195, the FC granted BC's motion for an interlocutory injunction. The court found that BC had satisfied that its case raised a serious issue to be......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles