Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited,, 2017 ABQB 218
Judge | Graesser |
Subject Matter | PRACTICE,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS,TORTS |
Citation | 2017 ABQB 218 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Date | 28 March 2017 |
Docket Number | 1203 06749 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35
...from the Judgment by The Honourable Mr. Justice R.A. Graesser Dated the 28th day of March, 2017 Filed on the 28th day of March, 2017 (2017 ABQB 218, Docket: 1203 _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment __________________________________________________......
-
United Inc v Canadian National Railway Company, 2020 ABQB 413
...Oil Limited, 2003 ABQB 898 at para 5 [Wainwright]; Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2017 ABQB 218 at para 65 [Brookfield QB], affirmed on appeal 2019 ABCA 35. Since the criteria are being balanced, deficiencies in the evidence may speak to th......
-
Case Law Update: Alberta Court Of Appeal Confirms That A Plaintiff May Lose The Right To Sue For Historic Contamination Because Of The Passage Of Time And Procedural Requirements
...ABCA]. 2 Limitations Act, RSA 2000, c L-12, s 3(1). 3 Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Ltd, 2017 ABQB 218 [Brookfield ABQB]; Lakeview Village Professional Centre Corporation v Suncor Energy Inc, 2016 ABQB 288 4 Environmental Protection and Enhancement......
-
When is an Environmental Contamination Claim Too Old to Extend the Limitation Period?
...contamination claim, the court recently ruled in Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2017 ABQB 218 [Brookfield]. In Brookfield, the likelihood of prejudice to the defendant in granting an extension was significant since the alleged cause of the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35
...from the Judgment by The Honourable Mr. Justice R.A. Graesser Dated the 28th day of March, 2017 Filed on the 28th day of March, 2017 (2017 ABQB 218, Docket: 1203 _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment __________________________________________________......
-
United Inc v Canadian National Railway Company, 2020 ABQB 413
...Oil Limited, 2003 ABQB 898 at para 5 [Wainwright]; Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2017 ABQB 218 at para 65 [Brookfield QB], affirmed on appeal 2019 ABCA 35. Since the criteria are being balanced, deficiencies in the evidence may speak to th......
3 firm's commentaries
-
Case Law Update: Alberta Court Of Appeal Confirms That A Plaintiff May Lose The Right To Sue For Historic Contamination Because Of The Passage Of Time And Procedural Requirements
...ABCA]. 2 Limitations Act, RSA 2000, c L-12, s 3(1). 3 Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Ltd, 2017 ABQB 218 [Brookfield ABQB]; Lakeview Village Professional Centre Corporation v Suncor Energy Inc, 2016 ABQB 288 4 Environmental Protection and Enhancement......
-
When is an Environmental Contamination Claim Too Old to Extend the Limitation Period?
...contamination claim, the court recently ruled in Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2017 ABQB 218 [Brookfield]. In Brookfield, the likelihood of prejudice to the defendant in granting an extension was significant since the alleged cause of the ......
-
When Is An Environmental Contamination Claim Too Old To Extend The Limitation Period?
...contamination claim, the court recently ruled in Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2017 ABQB 218 [Brookfield]. In Brookfield, the likelihood of prejudice to the defendant in granting an extension was significant since the alleged cause of the ......