Brooks v. Habib

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeDardi
Citation2019 BCSC 1398
Docket NumberM147891
Date21 August 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
24 practice notes
  • Kaur v. Tse
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 22, 2020
    ...provided an overview of British Columbia cases considering the principle in the context of future care costs awards in Brooks v. Habib, 2019 BCSC 1398: [362] Any potential reduction in an award for future care cost is rooted in the fundamental principle for compensation in tort law that a p......
  • Ham v. Dhaliwal
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 30, 2022
    ...an income loss. Instead, pain during work without economic consequences is compensated through the non-pecuniary award: Brooks v. Habib, 2019 BCSC 1398 at para. 335; Jacobi v. Monteith, 2020 BCSC 218 at para. 30. If a plaintiff is able to continue working, albeit with ongoing chro......
  • Klimek v. Lockhart
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 13, 2023
    ...mark”, citing Corness v. Ng, 2022 BCSC 334. B.   Discussion [45]       In Brooks v. Habib, 2019 BCSC 1398, Dardi J. conveniently summarised the general nature of the plaintiff’s burden to prove causation in a negligence case, stating as ......
  • Zoerb v Saskatoon Regional Health Authority
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 5, 2022
    ...example, Grivicic v Alberta Health Services (Tom Baker Cancer Centre), 2017 ABCA 246 at para 34, 55 Alta LR (6th) 281; Brooks v Habib, 2019 BCSC 1398 at para 204; Leckie v Chaiton, 2021 ONSC 7770 at para 25. [53]           That does not......
  • Get Started for Free
20 cases
  • Kaur v. Tse
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 22, 2020
    ...provided an overview of British Columbia cases considering the principle in the context of future care costs awards in Brooks v. Habib, 2019 BCSC 1398: [362] Any potential reduction in an award for future care cost is rooted in the fundamental principle for compensation in tort law that a p......
  • Ham v. Dhaliwal
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 30, 2022
    ...an income loss. Instead, pain during work without economic consequences is compensated through the non-pecuniary award: Brooks v. Habib, 2019 BCSC 1398 at para. 335; Jacobi v. Monteith, 2020 BCSC 218 at para. 30. If a plaintiff is able to continue working, albeit with ongoing chro......
  • Klimek v. Lockhart
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 13, 2023
    ...mark”, citing Corness v. Ng, 2022 BCSC 334. B.   Discussion [45]       In Brooks v. Habib, 2019 BCSC 1398, Dardi J. conveniently summarised the general nature of the plaintiff’s burden to prove causation in a negligence case, stating as ......
  • Zoerb v Saskatoon Regional Health Authority
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 5, 2022
    ...example, Grivicic v Alberta Health Services (Tom Baker Cancer Centre), 2017 ABCA 246 at para 34, 55 Alta LR (6th) 281; Brooks v Habib, 2019 BCSC 1398 at para 204; Leckie v Chaiton, 2021 ONSC 7770 at para 25. [53]           That does not......
  • Get Started for Free