Cadostin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Citation | 2020 FC 183 |
Date | 31 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Zabihiseasan v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1119
...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments, or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 [Cadostin] at para 36). The general rule is that lay witnesses may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within their knowled......
-
Appointments and the Public Service Employment Act
... [1999] FCJ No 1638 (CA). See also Adams v Canada (Attorney General) , [2003] FCJ No 135 . 249 Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General) , 2020 FC 183 at para 48, af’d 2021 FCA 21 [ Cadostin ]. 250 PSEA , ss 66 & 67. 600 | LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE “broad supe......
-
Choudhry v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1085
...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments, or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 [Cadostin] at para 36). The general rule is that lay witnesses may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within their knowled......
-
Seklani v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 778
...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 at para 36). The general rule is that a lay witness may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within his or her knowledge, obs......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Zabihiseasan v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1119
...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments, or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 [Cadostin] at para 36). The general rule is that lay witnesses may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within their knowled......
-
Choudhry v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1085
...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments, or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 [Cadostin] at para 36). The general rule is that lay witnesses may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within their knowled......
-
Seklani v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 778
...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 at para 36). The general rule is that a lay witness may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within his or her knowledge, obs......
-
SSE Holdings, LLC v. Le Chic Shack Inc., 2020 FC 983
...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 at para 36). The general rule is that a lay witness may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within his or her knowledge, obs......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Appointments and the Public Service Employment Act
... [1999] FCJ No 1638 (CA). See also Adams v Canada (Attorney General) , [2003] FCJ No 135 . 249 Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General) , 2020 FC 183 at para 48, af’d 2021 FCA 21 [ Cadostin ]. 250 PSEA , ss 66 & 67. 600 | LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE “broad supe......