Cadostin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2020 FC 183
Date31 January 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Zabihiseasan v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1119
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 18, 2023
    ...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments, or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 [Cadostin] at para 36). The general rule is that lay witnesses may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within their knowled......
  • Appointments and the Public Service Employment Act
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Labour and Employment Law in the Federal Public Service - Second Edition Part IV
    • February 27, 2024
    ... [1999] FCJ No 1638 (CA). See also Adams v Canada (Attorney General) , [2003] FCJ No 135 . 249 Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General) , 2020 FC 183 at para 48, af’d 2021 FCA 21 [ Cadostin ]. 250 PSEA , ss 66 & 67. 600 | LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE “broad supe......
  • Choudhry v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1085
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 9, 2023
    ...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments, or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 [Cadostin] at para 36). The general rule is that lay witnesses may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within their knowled......
  • Seklani v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 778
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 23, 2020
    ...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 at para 36). The general rule is that a lay witness may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within his or her knowledge, obs......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Zabihiseasan v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1119
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 18, 2023
    ...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments, or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 [Cadostin] at para 36). The general rule is that lay witnesses may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within their knowled......
  • Choudhry v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1085
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 9, 2023
    ...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments, or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 [Cadostin] at para 36). The general rule is that lay witnesses may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within their knowled......
  • Seklani v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 778
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 23, 2020
    ...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 at para 36). The general rule is that a lay witness may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within his or her knowledge, obs......
  • SSE Holdings, LLC v. Le Chic Shack Inc., 2020 FC 983
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 5, 2020
    ...irrelevant, or where they contain opinions, arguments or legal conclusions (Quadrini at para 18; Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 183 at para 36). The general rule is that a lay witness may not give opinion evidence but may only testify to facts within his or her knowledge, obs......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Appointments and the Public Service Employment Act
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Labour and Employment Law in the Federal Public Service - Second Edition Part IV
    • February 27, 2024
    ... [1999] FCJ No 1638 (CA). See also Adams v Canada (Attorney General) , [2003] FCJ No 135 . 249 Cadostin v Canada (Attorney General) , 2020 FC 183 at para 48, af’d 2021 FCA 21 [ Cadostin ]. 250 PSEA , ss 66 & 67. 600 | LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE “broad supe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT