Caine v. Burris, 2016 ABQB 126

JudgeRenke, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW
Citation2016 ABQB 126
Date24 February 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • JMM v TLG, 2019 ABQB 81
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 5, 2019
    ...payments or may result in reduced child support payments if the individual can meet the test for undue hardship (see Caine v Burris, 2016 ABQB 126; Hutton v Hutton, 2000 BCSC 913; Schlotfeldt v Schlotfeldt, 2008 BCSC 678 at para 41; Petersen v Petersen, 2007 BCSC 497). Additionally, where a......
  • CR v PS,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 13, 2022
    ...Counsel referenced a number of cases in their submissions. Ms. Lawrence focused her arguments on: Gordon v Goertz; Cain v Burris, 2016 ABQB 126; Ting v Ting, 2022 ABQB 229; and Scott v MacLean, 2019 ABQB 0895; as well as some of the cases cited in those decisions.   [63]  &#x......
  • St. Pierre v Brown,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 11, 2021
    ...the care of the primary parent: Milton v Letch, 2013 ABCA 248 at para 14; R.J.F v C.M.F., 2014 ABCA 165 at para 32-33; Caine v Burris, 2016 ABQB 126 at para [12] The Alberta Court of Appeal has emphasized a parent’s freedom to move (MacPhail at para 44-45) and has also emphasized that a tri......
  • St Laurent v Pursha,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 6, 2021
    ...of the effect of removing the child from the care of the primary parent (Milton v Letch 2013 ABCA 248 para 14, Caine v Burris 2016 ABQB 126 para 31-33). Delray has resided with his mother since [36]        In the present situation there are benefits to Del......
4 cases
  • JMM v TLG, 2019 ABQB 81
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 5, 2019
    ...payments or may result in reduced child support payments if the individual can meet the test for undue hardship (see Caine v Burris, 2016 ABQB 126; Hutton v Hutton, 2000 BCSC 913; Schlotfeldt v Schlotfeldt, 2008 BCSC 678 at para 41; Petersen v Petersen, 2007 BCSC 497). Additionally, where a......
  • CR v PS,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 13, 2022
    ...Counsel referenced a number of cases in their submissions. Ms. Lawrence focused her arguments on: Gordon v Goertz; Cain v Burris, 2016 ABQB 126; Ting v Ting, 2022 ABQB 229; and Scott v MacLean, 2019 ABQB 0895; as well as some of the cases cited in those decisions.   [63]  &#x......
  • St. Pierre v Brown,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 11, 2021
    ...the care of the primary parent: Milton v Letch, 2013 ABCA 248 at para 14; R.J.F v C.M.F., 2014 ABCA 165 at para 32-33; Caine v Burris, 2016 ABQB 126 at para [12] The Alberta Court of Appeal has emphasized a parent’s freedom to move (MacPhail at para 44-45) and has also emphasized that a tri......
  • St Laurent v Pursha,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 6, 2021
    ...of the effect of removing the child from the care of the primary parent (Milton v Letch 2013 ABCA 248 para 14, Caine v Burris 2016 ABQB 126 para 31-33). Delray has resided with his mother since [36]        In the present situation there are benefits to Del......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT