Calandrini v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 52
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 52 |
| Date | 19 January 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Fatola v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 FC 479
...that is the product of a fettered discretion must per se be unreasonable (at para 24; see also Calandrini v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 52 at paras 100-101). For the purposes of this application, I adopt the approach taken in Gordon, where Justice Mactavish held that under either sta......
-
Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277
...cases: Stemijon Investments Ltd v Canada (Attorney General), 2011 FCA 299 at paras 20-24; Calandrini v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 52 at para 100-101. In Stemijon, Stratas JA concluded that “a decision that is the product of a fettered discretion must per se be unreasonable”: para 24......
-
Lewis v. Canada (Attorney General),
...issue. It is relevant that this issue has already arisen in other cases (see, for example: Calandrini v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 52 and Quibell v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 1208), and it merits further discussion here since it was so fully canvassed by the parties. C. Was ......
-
Carola v. Canada (Attorney General),
...of the RCMP and consequently their decisions in such matters are entitled to deference (Calandrini v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 52 at para 51), no deference is to be afforded on issues involving breaches of procedural fairness (McBain v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 829 at para......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Kohl v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 45
...RCMP and that their decisions in such matters are entitled to a considerable amount of deference (Calandrini v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 52 at para 97; Firsov v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 877 at para 38). Similarly, in the context of the RCMP’s internal grievance pro......
-
Fatola v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 FC 479
...that is the product of a fettered discretion must per se be unreasonable (at para 24; see also Calandrini v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 52 at paras 100-101). For the purposes of this application, I adopt the approach taken in Gordon, where Justice Mactavish held that under either sta......
-
Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277
...cases: Stemijon Investments Ltd v Canada (Attorney General), 2011 FCA 299 at paras 20-24; Calandrini v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 52 at para 100-101. In Stemijon, Stratas JA concluded that “a decision that is the product of a fettered discretion must per se be unreasonable”: para 24......
-
Lewis v. Canada (Attorney General),
...issue. It is relevant that this issue has already arisen in other cases (see, for example: Calandrini v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 52 and Quibell v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 1208), and it merits further discussion here since it was so fully canvassed by the parties. C. Was ......
Request a trial to view additional results