Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277

JudgeRowbotham
Citation2019 ABCA 277
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Docket Number1801-0258-AC
Date11 July 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • FortisAlberta Inc v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2020 ABCA 271
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 21, 2020
    ...standard of appellate review that would be applied if permission to appeal is granted: see EQUS REA Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277 at paras 11-12, [2019] AJ No 917 (QL); ATCO Electric Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 417 at paras 10-11, [2019] AJ No 1452 ......
  • Rocky View Water Co-Op Ltd v Cidex Developments Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 29, 2021
    ...[70]        Other cases which mention the RUA include: Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277; Contract Policy Committee v FortisAlberta Inc., 2012 ABQB 653; Fazikos v. Manning Rural Electrification Association, 2011 ABPC 279. [71]&#x......
  • The Office of the Utilities Consumer Advocate v Alberta Utilities Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 7, 2021
    ... the standard of appellate review that would be applied if leave were granted: Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277 at para Fair Return Issue Significance to the practice and significance to these proceedings [13]        The GU......
  • United Food and Commercial Workers Canada Union, Local No. 401 v. Sofina Foods Inc., 2019 ABCA 418
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 31, 2019
    ...5. The standard of review applicable if permission to appeal were granted. See, eg, Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277 at para 12. Application of the factors [27] The respondents submit that the standard of review on appeal to this court would be reasonableness. Th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • FortisAlberta Inc v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2020 ABCA 271
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 21, 2020
    ...standard of appellate review that would be applied if permission to appeal is granted: see EQUS REA Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277 at paras 11-12, [2019] AJ No 917 (QL); ATCO Electric Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 417 at paras 10-11, [2019] AJ No 1452 ......
  • Rocky View Water Co-Op Ltd v Cidex Developments Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 29, 2021
    ...[70]        Other cases which mention the RUA include: Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277; Contract Policy Committee v FortisAlberta Inc., 2012 ABQB 653; Fazikos v. Manning Rural Electrification Association, 2011 ABPC 279. [71]&#x......
  • The Office of the Utilities Consumer Advocate v Alberta Utilities Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 7, 2021
    ... the standard of appellate review that would be applied if leave were granted: Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277 at para Fair Return Issue Significance to the practice and significance to these proceedings [13]        The GU......
  • United Food and Commercial Workers Canada Union, Local No. 401 v. Sofina Foods Inc., 2019 ABCA 418
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 31, 2019
    ...5. The standard of review applicable if permission to appeal were granted. See, eg, Equs Rea Ltd v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2019 ABCA 277 at para 12. Application of the factors [27] The respondents submit that the standard of review on appeal to this court would be reasonableness. Th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT