Cambridge Plumbing Systems Ltd. v. Strata Plan VR 1632, Owners, [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 605 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeDorgan, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterCONTRACTS,PRACTICE,BUILDING CONTRACTS
Citation[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 605 (SC),[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 605,2010 BCSC 459,2009 BCSC 605
Date01 May 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • True Construction Ltd. v. Kamloops (City), (2016) 386 B.C.A.C. 82 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • April 21, 2016
    ...expectations of the parties, including other bidders: see generally Cambridge Plumbing Systems Ltd. v. Owners, Strata Plan VR 1632 , 2009 BCSC 605 at para. 32. [24] The post-bid conduct and views of the parties should not be relied on in determining the compliance of the bid: M.G. Logging &......
  • True Construction Ltd. v. Kamloops (City), 2014 BCSC 2125
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 13, 2014
    ...Dorgan thoroughly canvassed and summarized the law in this area in Cambridge Plumbing Systems Ltd. v. Owners, Strata Plan VR 1632 , 2009 BCSC 605. She began with the Contract A/Contract B framework at paras. 14-16: The Law: Contract A / Contract B Framework [14] The starting place for tende......
  • Maple Reinders Inc. v. Cerco Developments Ltd. et al., 2011 BCSC 924
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 11, 2011
    ...Court may rely upon the conduct of the parties was further discussed in Cambridge Plumbing Systems Ltd. v. Owners, Strata Plan VR 1632 , 2009 BCSC 605, where Madam Justice Dorgan stated: [28] Cambridge raises one case that seems to look at the actions of owners to determine compliance: Hub ......
  • Surespan Construction Ltd. v. Saskatchewan, [2013] Sask.R. Uned. 5
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 22, 2013
    ...the defendant is also obliged to treat all bidders fairly and equally. [28] In Cambridge Plumbing Systems Ltd. v. Strata Plan VR 1632 , 2009 BCSC 605,[2009] 9 W.W.R. 486, the court explained the rationale for the proposition that only compliant bids can be accepted: 17 That an owner is "inc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • True Construction Ltd. v. Kamloops (City), (2016) 386 B.C.A.C. 82 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • April 21, 2016
    ...expectations of the parties, including other bidders: see generally Cambridge Plumbing Systems Ltd. v. Owners, Strata Plan VR 1632 , 2009 BCSC 605 at para. 32. [24] The post-bid conduct and views of the parties should not be relied on in determining the compliance of the bid: M.G. Logging &......
  • True Construction Ltd. v. Kamloops (City), 2014 BCSC 2125
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 13, 2014
    ...Dorgan thoroughly canvassed and summarized the law in this area in Cambridge Plumbing Systems Ltd. v. Owners, Strata Plan VR 1632 , 2009 BCSC 605. She began with the Contract A/Contract B framework at paras. 14-16: The Law: Contract A / Contract B Framework [14] The starting place for tende......
  • Maple Reinders Inc. v. Cerco Developments Ltd. et al., 2011 BCSC 924
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 11, 2011
    ...Court may rely upon the conduct of the parties was further discussed in Cambridge Plumbing Systems Ltd. v. Owners, Strata Plan VR 1632 , 2009 BCSC 605, where Madam Justice Dorgan stated: [28] Cambridge raises one case that seems to look at the actions of owners to determine compliance: Hub ......
  • Surespan Construction Ltd. v. Saskatchewan, [2013] Sask.R. Uned. 5
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 22, 2013
    ...the defendant is also obliged to treat all bidders fairly and equally. [28] In Cambridge Plumbing Systems Ltd. v. Strata Plan VR 1632 , 2009 BCSC 605,[2009] 9 W.W.R. 486, the court explained the rationale for the proposition that only compliant bids can be accepted: 17 That an owner is "inc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT